Transparency – more than a buzzword?

Authors

  • Paul Beckmann
  • Karolina Gombert
  • Alexander Hoppe
  • Katharina Jautz
  • Miriam Lindner
  • Jessica Roome
  • Hanna San Nicoló
  • Lara Schartau
  • Julia Schmälter
  • Tassilo Stiller
  • Anne Theunissen

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26481/marble.2012.v1.117

Abstract

The concept of transparency can be applied to nearly every domain of human activity. In each of these diverse domains transparency is thought to provide the public with information in order to make reasoned judgements: be it information about who to vote for, who to employ, which medications to take, or which Non Governmental Organization to support. If people are sufficiently informed, the argument goes, they are able to hold political officials accountable, find more competent staff, and even punish mismanagement and corruption. As Bessire (2005) puts it, “transparency is strongly related to information – and information is power” (p. 429). This line of reasoning ignores the fact that the availability of information is not the only aspect of accountability. If the public does not know what is happening behind closed doors, it naturally has no incentive – and indeed no chance – to hold somebody accountable necessary. As well as having access to relevant information, people must have measures at their disposal to punish responsible actors.

References

Bessire, D. (2007). Transparency – A two way mirror. International Journal of Social Economics, 32(5), 424 – 438.

Giddens, A. (1990). The Consequences of Modernity. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Heald, D. & Hood, C. (2006). Transparency: The Key to Better Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Hinnant, C., Jae Moon M. & Welch, E. (2004). Linking citizen satisfaction with e-government and trust in government. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15(3), 371-391.

Mayes, G. R. (2010). Privacy in a Transparent Society. Retrieved September 25, 2011, from http:// www.csus.edu/indiv/m/mayesgr/Scribble/Privacy%20Stuff/Privacy%20in%20a%20 Transparent%20Society.pdf

Neyland, D. (2007). Achieving Transparency: The Visible, Invisible and Divisible in Academic Accountability Networks. Organization, 14(4), 499-516.

Pels, D. (2003). Aesthetic Representation and Political Style. In Corner, J. & Pels, D. (Eds.). (2003). Media and the Restyling of Politics. London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi: Sage publications.

Poster, M. (1995). The second media age. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Stiglitz, J. (1999). On Liberty, the Right to Know, and Public Discourse: The Role of Transparency in Public Life. Oxford: Oxford Amnesty Lecture.

The Economist. (2010). The Future of WikiLeaks. WikiLeaks and the creed of guerrilla transparency. Retrieved May 24, 2011, from http://www.economist.com/blogs/ democracyinamerica/2010/12/future_wikileaks

Transpareny International. (2011). The role of transparency in the financial sector. Retrieved December 18, 2011, from: http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/bank/docs/gebi/ terray_en.pdf

Time in the Shadows of Anonymity: Against Surveillance, Transparency and Globalized Capitalism. (n.d.). Retrieved May 24, 2011, from http://www.notbored.org/transparent.html

WikiLeaks, (n.d.). Keep us Strong. Retrieved May 24, 2011, from http://www.wikileaks.ch/

Downloads

Published

2012-07-01