The complement of political consumerism: Political producerism in the German organic food sector

Authors

  • Birgit Gall
  • Tamara Wörner

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26481/marble.2012.v2.130

Abstract

In this chapter we will show that there is a direct link between political producerism and political consumerism, meaning that labels and especially the networks behind them enable consumers to make informed choices and to voice their political opinion. So far,academics often assessed labels from an economic point of view, for example adopting a game theoretic approach or dealing with the problem of asymmetric information in the food market (Golan, Kuchler, Mitchell, 2009; McCluskey, 2000; Guthman, 2006). Other academics such as Hébert (2010) argue that food labels are mainly established to cater to the economy of qualities, referring to the creation of luxury niche-market goods. In contrast to these accounts and to other accounts of authors such as Vogl, Kilcher & Schmidt (2005) and McMahon (2005), we believe that producers and retailers indeed are important agents in politics of food labelling. Rather than merely following the demands of the market, we will show that producers and retailers who engage in political producerism mainly act according to their own beliefs and standards.

References

Amstel, M., Driessen, P., Glasbergen, P. (2006). Eco-Labeling and information asymmetry: A comparison of five eco-labels in the Netherlands. Journal of Cleaner Production, pp. 1-14.

Bioland (2001). “Künast-Siegel” – ein bedeutenders Schritt für die Ausweitung des Biolandbaus. Retrieved on 19/05/11 from http://www.bioland.de/presse/pm/010905.htm

Bioland (2006). Biosiegel hat sich als staatliches Prüfzeichen bewehrt. Retrieved on 19/05/11 from http://www.bioland.de/presse/pressemitteilung/article/36.html

Bioland (2008). Bioland Satzung. Retrieved on 19/05/11 from http://www.bioland.de/fileadmin/bioland/file/bioland/Bioland_Satzung_2008.pdf

Bioland (2011a). Willkommen bei Bioland. Retrieved on 19/05/11 from http://www.bioland.de/bioland/startseite.html

Bioland (2011b). Wir über uns. http://www.bioland.de/erzeuger/

Bioland (2011c). Der Anbauverband stellt sich vor. Retrieved on 19/05/11 from http://www.bioland.de/bioland/bioland.html

Bioland (2011d). Starke Argumente für Bio. Retrieved on 19/05/11 from http://www.bioland.de/wissen/starke-argumente/wahlfreiheit.html

Bioland (2011e). Bioland und seine Strukturen. Retrieved on 19/05/11 from http://www.bioland.de/bioland/bioland/strukturen.html

Bio-Siegel (2011). Zahlen & Fakten. Retrieved 21/05/11 from http://www.bio-siegel.de/

Bio-Siegel (2006). The Bio-Siegel at a glance. Retrieved 20/05/11 from http://www.bio-siegel.de/english/basics/frequently-asked-questions/what-does-bio-mean/

Bund ökologischer Lebensmittelwirtschaft (2011) Zahlen, Daten, Fakten: Die Bio-Branche 2010. Retrieved on 19/05/11 from http://www.boelw.de/uploads/media/pdf/Dokumentation/ Zahlen__Daten__Fakten/ZDF2010gesamt.pdf

Bundesministerium für Ernährung, Landwirtschaft und Verbraucherschutz (BMELV), (2011). Bio-Siegel. Retrieved on 19/05/11 from http://www.bio-siegel.de/startseite/

Demeter (2009). Demeter Journal (Ausgabe 5). Retrieved on 18/04/11 from http://www.demeter.de/ebenenangleichung/zielgruppe/schnittmengen/kennenlernen /demeter-journal/?MP=14-1492

Demeter (2010). Demeter als Qualitätsführer – Mehr als der kleine Unterschied im Vergleich zu EU-Bio. Retrieved on 24/05/11 from http://www.mitkochzentrale.net/pager.do?page=higru&cont=/higru/quali&sel=comen1

Demeter (2011a). Biologisch-dynamisch von Anfang an. Retrieved on 19/05/11 from http://www.demeter.de/ebenenangleichung/zielgruppe/schnittmengen/kennenlernen/ historie/?MP=14-1492

Demeter (2011b). Herzlich Wilkommen bei Demeter. Retrieved on 19/05/11 from http://www.demeter.de/

Demeter (2011c). Demeter Journal (Ausgabe 9). Retrieved on 18/04/11 from http://www.demeter.de/ebenenangleichung/zielgruppe/schnittmengen/kennenlernen/ demeter-journal/?MP=14-1492

Dubuisson-Quellier, S. and Lamine, C. (2008). Consumer involvement in fair trade and local food systems: delegation and empowerment regimes. GeoJournal 73, 55-65.

European Commission (2011). Organic Farming: Good for nature, good for you. Retrieved on 19/05/11 from http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/organic/eu-policy/legislation_en

Freimuth, V. S., Hammond, S. L., Stein, J. A. (2003). Health advertising: prevention for profit. American Journal of Public Health. 78(5), pp. 557-561.

Golan, E., Kuchler, F. & Mitchell, L. (2009). The Economics of Food Labelling. Economic Research Service: pp. 1-41.

Guthman, J. (2006). Neoliberalism and the making of food politics in California. Geoforum 39 (2008). pp. 1171-1183.

Hébert, K. (2010). In Pursuit of Singular Salmon: Paradoxes of Sustainability and the Quality Commodity. Science as a Culture, (19/4), pp. 553-581.

Hertz, N. (2003). The Silent Takeover: Global Capitalism and the Death of Democracy. Harper Collins.

Ippolito, P. (2003). Nutrition and Health Advertising. Novinka Books: USA.

McCluskey, J. J. (2000). A Game Theoretic Approach to Organic Foods: An Analysis of Asymmetric Information and Policy. Agricultural and Resource Economic Review (29/1), pp. 1-9.

McMahon, N. (2005). Biodynamic Farmers in Ireland. Transforming Society Through Purity, Solitude and Bearing Witness? Sociologia Ruralis. (45/1/2). pp. 98-114.

Micheletti, M. (2003). Political Virtue and Shopping: Individuals, Consumerism, and Collective Action. Palgrave McMillan.

Rousu, M. C. (2008). Estimating the Welfare Loss to Consumers When Food Labels Do Not Adequately Inform. Journal of Agricultural & Food Industrial Organization. 6(3), pp. 1-16.

Ökobarometer (2010). Verbraucher haben die Vorteile im Blick. Retrieved on 25/05/11 from http://www.oekolandbau.de/journalisten/studien/

Vogl, C. R., Kilcher, L. & Schmidt, H. (2005). Are Standards and Regulations of Organic Farming Moving away from Small farmers’ knowledge? Journal of Sustainable Agriculture (26/1), pp. 5-24.

Downloads

Published

2015-07-01