A neuroscientific perspective on cognitive and volitional impairment in criminal irresponsibility assessments: a case for a capacity-based approach

Nina Koivula


The law remains reluctant of joining forces with neuroscience to better understand human behaviour despite the fact that “preliminary biological explanations” exist for a number of relevant phenomena (Garland & Glimcher, 2006, p. 131). Contemporary brain imaging techniques have enabled the study of law-related notions such as consciousness, morality and intent, to name a few (Gazzaniga, 2008, p. 412). Others argue that neuroscience is not advanced enough to uncover mental content that is pertinent to the law (Morse, 2011, pp. 849-850). It has also been suggested that even if it were possible to prove a precise correlation between the requirements for criminal responsibility and certain neural patterns, these patterns could only amount to “evidentiary support for the assertion that the criterion in question was in fact satisfied at the time of the crime” (Morse, 2006, p. 399). Plausibly, these claims do not warrant ignorance towards existing neuroscientific research, which is not insignificant in volume. Moreover, it is hard to see why the society as a whole would not benefit from legal determinations which are as rigorous and precise as possible. It could be argued that every insight – whether neuroscientific, sociological or evolutionary, for example – provides a “reality” of human behaviour from a distinct, but complementary point of view.

Full Text:



Case law of the Finnish Supreme Court:






Books and articles:

Husak, D. (2013). Reply: The Importance of Asking the Right Question: What is Punishment Imposed For? In R.L. Christopher (Ed.), George Fletcher’s Essays on Criminal Law (pp. 53-57). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Klaming, L. & Koops, B.J. (2012). Neuroscientific Evidence and Criminal Responsibility in the Netherlands. In T.M. Spranger (Ed.), International Neurolaw. A Comparative Analysis (pp. 227-256). Heidelberg: Springer.

Sinnott-Armstrong, W. & Levy, K. (2011, p. 312). Insanity defenses. In J. Deigh & D. Dolinko (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of philosophy of criminal law (pp. 299-334). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Tadros, V. (2007). Criminal Responsibility. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Aharoni, E., & Funk, C., & Sinnott-Armstrong, A., & Gazzaniga, M. (2008). Can Neurological Evidence Help Courts Assess Criminal Responsibility? Lessons from Law and Neuroscience. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1124, pp. 145-160.

Aichert, D.S., & Wöstmann, N.M., & Costa, A., & Macare, C., & Weinig, J.R., & Möller, H-J., & Rubia, K., & Ettinger, U. (2012). Associations between trait impulsivity and prepotent response inhibition. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 34(10), pp. 1016-1032.

Batts, S. (2009). Brain lesions and their implications in criminal responsibility. Behavioral Sciences and the Law 27(2), pp. 261-272.

Bennett, M.R. (2008). Consciousness and hallucinations in schizophrenia: the role of synapse regression. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry 42, pp. 915-931.

Broome, M.R., & Bortolotti, L., & Mameli, M. (2010). Moral Responsibility and Mental Illness: A Case Study. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 19(2), pp. 179-187.

Bufkin, L., & Luttrell, V.R. (2005). Neuroimaging Studies of Aggressive and Violent Behavior : Current Findings and Implications for Criminology and Criminal Justice. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse 6(2), pp. 176-191.

Bzdok, D., & Schilbach, L., & Vogeley, K., & Schneider, K., & Laird, A.R., & Langner, R., & Eickhoff, S.B. (2012). Parsing the neural correlates of moral cognition: ALE meta-analysis on morality, theory of mind, and empathy. Brain Struct. Funct 217, pp. 783-796.

Carrido, M. (2012). Revisiting the Insanity Defense: A Case for Resurrecting the Volitional Prong of the Insanity Defense in the Light of Neuroscientific Advances. Southwestern Law Review 41, pp. 309-330.

Casebeer, W.D. (2003). Moral cognition and its neural constituents. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 4, pp. 841-846.

Ciaramelli, E., & Muccioli, M., & La’davas, E., & di Pellegrino, G. (2007). Selective deficit in personal moral judgment following damage to ventromedial prefrontal cortex. SCAN 2, pp. 84-92.

Congdon, E., & Canli, T. (2008). A Neurogenetic Approach to Impulsivity. Journal of Personality 76(6) pp. 1447-1484.

Congdon, E., & Lesch, K.P., & Canli, T. (2008). Analysis of DRD4 and DAT Polymorphisms and Behavioral Inhibition in Healthy Adults: Implications for Impulsivity. American Journal of Medicinal Genetics Part B: Neuropsychiatric Genetics 147 B, pp. 27-32.

Corrado, M. (2010). The Case for a Purely Volitional Insanity Defense. Texas Tech Law Review 42, de Oliveira-Souza, R., & Moll, J. (2009). The Neural Bases of Normal and Deviant Moral Cognition and Behavior. Top Magn. Reson. Imaging 20, pp. 261-270.

Eastman, N., & Campbell, C. (2006). Neuroscience and legal determination of criminal responsibility. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 7, pp. 311-318.

Enticott, P.G., & Ogloff, J.R.P., & Bradshaw, J.L. (2006). Associations between laboratory measures of executive inhibitory control and self-reported impulsivity. Personality and Individual Differences 41, pp. 285-294.

Forbes, C.E., & Grafman, J. (2010). The Role of the Human Prefrontal Cortex in Social Cognition and Moral Judgment. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 33, pp. 299-324.

Fumagalli, M. & Priori, A. (2012). Functional and clinical neuroanatomy of morality. Brain 135, pp. 2006-2021.

Funk, C.M. & Gazzaniga, M.S. (2009). The functional brain architecture of human morality. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 19, pp. 678-681.

Garland, B., & Glimcher, P.W. (2006). Cognitive Neuroscience and Law. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 16, pp. 130-134.

Gazzaniga, M.S. (2008). The Law and Neuroscience. Neuron 60, pp. 412-415.

Gotlieb, A.E. (1956). Intention, and Knowing the Nature and Quality of an Act. The Modern Law Review 19(3), pp. 270-275.

Juan, C-H., & Muggleton, N.G. (2012). Brain stimulation and inhibitory control. Brain Stimulation 5, pp. 63-69.

Juan, Y., & Meng, X., & Yang, J., & Yao, G., & Hu, L., & Yuan, H. (2012). The valence strength of unpleasant emotion modulates brain processing of behavioral inhibitory control: Neural correlates. Biological Psychology 89, pp. 240-251.

Kays, J.L., & Hurley, R.A., & Taber, K.H. (2012). The Dynamic Brain: Neuroplasticity and Mental Health. J Neuropsychiatry Clin. Neurosci. 24(2), pp. 118-124. pp. 481-511.

Knabb, J., & Welsh, R.K., & Ziebell, J.G., & Reimer, K.S. (2009). Neuroscience, Moral Reasoning, and the Law. Behavioral Sciences and the Law 27, pp. 219-236.

Knoll, J.L., & Resnick, P.J. (2008). Insanity Defense Evaluations: Toward a Model for Evidence- Based Practice. Brief Treatment and Crisis Intervention 8(1), pp. 92-110.

Kobayashi, Y., & Sano, Y., & Vannoni, E., & Goto, H., & Suzuki, H., & Oba, A., & Kawasaki, H., & Kanba, S., & Lipp, H-P., & Murphy, N.P., & Wolver, D.P., & Itohara, S. (2013). Genetic dissection of medial habenula-interprenducular nucleus pathway function in mice. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience 7, pp. 1-20.

Kolb, B. & Whishaw, I.Q. (1998). Brain Plasticity and Behavior. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 49, pp. 43-64.

Kurian, S.M. & Le-Niculescu, H., & Patel, S.D., & Bertram, D., & Davis, J., & Dike, C., & Yehyawi, N., & Lysaker, P., & Dustin, J., & Caligiuri, M., & Lohr, J., & Lahiri, D.K., & Nurnberger Jr, J.I., & Faraone, S.V., & Geyer, M.A., & Tsuang, M.T., & Schork, N.J., & Salomon, D.R., & Niculescu, A.B. (2011). Identification of blood biomarkers for psychosis using convergent functional genomics. Molecular Psychiatry 16, pp. 37-58.

Liddle, P.F. (1997). Dynamic neuroimaging with PET, SPET or fMRI. International Review of Psychiatry 9, pp. 331-337.

Liu, J., & Zubieta, J-K., & Heitzeg, M. (2012). Sex differences in anterior cingulate cortex activation during impulse inhibition and behavioural correlates. Psychiatry Res. 201(1), pp. 54-62. [Author manuscript].

Lotto, L., & Manfrinati, A., & Sarlo, M. (2013). A New Set of Moral Dilemmas: Norms for Moral Acceptability, Decision Times, and Emotional Salience. J. Behav. Decis. Making, pp. n.a. doi: 10.1002/bdm.1782

Manor, I. & Tyano, S. (1999). Organic disorders and psychosis. Current Opinion in Psychiatry 12(4), pp. 415-419 Marazziti, D., & Baroni, S., & Landi, P., & Ceresoli, D., & Dell’Osso, L. (2013). The neurobiology of moral sense : facts of hypotheses ? Annals of General Psychiatry 12(6), pp. 1-12.

Martell, D.A. (2009). Neuroscience and the Law: Philosophical Differences and Practical Constraints. Behavioural Sciences and the Law 27, pp. 123-136.

Martens, W.H.J. (2002). Criminality and Moral Dysfunctions: Neurological, Biochemical, and Genetic Dimensions. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology 46(2), pp. 170-182.

Martins-de-Souza, D., & Guest, P.C., & Steeb, H., & Pietsch, H., & Rahmoune, H., & Harris, L.W., & Bahn, S. (2011). Characterizing the proteome of the human dorsolateral prefrontal cortex by shotgun mass spectrometry. Proteomics 11, pp. 2347-2353.

Matsuo, K., & Nicoletti, M., & Nemoto, K., & Hatch, J.P., & Peluso, M.A.M., & Nery, F.B., & Soares, J.C. (2008). A Voxel-Based Morphometry Study of Frontal Gray Matter Correlates of Impulsivity. Human Brain Mapping 30, pp. 1188-1195.

Melle, I. (2013). The Breivik case and what psychiatrists can learn from it. World Psychiatry 12, pp. 16-21.

Mendez, M.F. (2009). The Neurobiology of Moral Behavior: Review and Neuropsychiatric Implications. CNS Spectr. 14(11), pp. 608-620.

Meynen, G. (2013). A neurolaw perspective on psychiatric assessments of criminal responsibility: Decision-making, mental disorder, and the brain. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 36, pp. 93-99.

Moll, J. & de Oliveira-Souza, R. (2007). Moral judgments, emotions and the utilitarian brain. TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences 11(8), pp. 319-321.

Moll, J., & Zahn, R., & de Oliveira-Souza, R., & Krueger, F., & Grafman, J. (2005). The neural basis of human moral cognition. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 6, pp. 799-809.

Morse, S.J. (1999). Craziness and Criminal Responsibility. Behavioral Sciences and the Law 17, pp. 147-164.

Morse, S.J. (2006). Brain Overclaim Syndrome and Criminal Responsibility: A Diagnostic Note. Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law 3, pp. 317-412.

Morse, S.J. (2007). Voluntary Control of Behavior and Responsibility. The American Journal of Bioethics 7(1), pp. 12-13.

Morse, S.J. (2011). Avoiding Irrational NeuroLaw Exuberance: A Plea for Neuromodesty. Mercer Law Review 62, pp. 837-859.

Muresanu, D.F., & Stan, A., Buzoianu, A. (2012). Neuroplasticity and impulse control disorders. Journal of the Neurological Sciences 316, pp. 15-20.

Nordström, A., & Dahlgren, L., & Kullgren, G. (2006). Victim relations and factors triggering homicides committed by offenders with schizophrenia. The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology 17(2), pp. 192-203.

Penney, S. (2012). Impulse control and criminal responsibility: Lessons from neuroscience. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 35, pp. 99-103.

Peoples, L.L. (2002). Will, Anterior Cingulate Cortex, and Addition. Science, New Series 296(5573), pp. 1623-1624.

Raine, A. & Yang, Y. (2006). Neural foundations to moral reasoning and antisocial behavior. SCAN 1, pp. 203-213.

Redding, R.E. (2006). The Brain-Disordered Defendant: Neuroscience and Legal Insanity In the Twenty-First Century. Villanova University School of Law Working Paper Series Paper 61, pp. 51-127.

Reider, L. (1998). Toward a New Test for the Insanity Defense: Incorporating the Discoveries of Neuroscience Into Moral and Legal Theories. UCLA Law Review 46, pp. 289-342.

Sapolsky, R.M. (2004). The frontal cortex and the criminal justice system. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 359, pp. 1787-1796.

Schleim, S., & Spranger, T.M., & Erk, S., & Walter, H. (2011). From moral to legal judgment: the influence of normative context in lawyers and other academics. SCAN 6, pp. 48-57.

Shoemaker, W.J. (2012). The social brain network and human moral behavior. Zygon 47(4), pp. 806-820.

Simmonds, D.J., & Pekar, J.J., & Mostofsky, S.H. (2008). Meta-analysis of Go/No-go tasks demonstrating that fMRI activation associated with response inhibition is task-dependent. Neuropsychologia 46, p. 224-232.

Slovenko, R. (1999). The Mental Disability Requirement in the Insanity Defense. Behavioural Sciences and the Law 17, pp. 165-180.

Tassy, S., & Oullier, O., & Duclos, Y., & Coulon, O., & Mancini, J., & Deruelle, C., & Attarian, S., & Felician, O., & Wicker, B. (2012). Disrupting the right prefrontal cortex alters moral judgement. SCAN 7, pp. 282-288.

Vincent, N.A. (2011). Neuroimaging and Responsibility Assessments. Neuroethics 4, pp. 35-49.

Wilson, S. (2009). Criminal responsibility. Psychiatry 8(12), pp. 473-475.

Woodbridge, F. (1939). Some Unusual Aspects of Mental Irresponsibility in the Criminal Law. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 29(6), pp. 822-847.

Yeo, S. (2008). The Insanity Defense in the Criminal Laws of the Commonwealth of Nations. Singapore Journal of Legal Studies pp. 241-263.

Zald, D.H., & Andreotti, C. (2010). Neuropsychological assessment of the orbital and ventromedial prefrontal cortex. Neuropsychologia 48, pp. 3377-3391.

Newspaper articles:

Aftenposten. (2011). Breivik nekter MR-undersøkelse av hjernen. Retrieved from: http:// www.aftenposten.no/nyheter/iriks/Breivik-nekter-MR-undersokelse-av-hjernen-6676378.html#.UcMwgPn-Fcx

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26481/marble.2014.v5.211


  • There are currently no refbacks.