Democracy and Resentment: Testing Scheler’s and Nietzsche’s Christian Resentment Theories on the Case of Protestantism

Maximilian Felix Blum

Abstract


The general perspective on the process of democratisation is a positive one, one that transmits progress and evolution. But Tocqueville and Scheler explain that the process of democratisation also has downsides. For instance, increasing equality generates more envy. Furthermore, Scheler explains that envy also lays the basis for resentment. This analysis looks at this interdependence of democracy and resentment within the case of Christianity. It looks at one of the most relevant examples of democratisation within Christianity, Protestantism. Based on Nietzsche’s and Scheler’s Christian resentment theories, this paper analyses whether Protestantism’s proposal of reformation is indeed resentful. In order to do so, it tests both theories on ‘The Freedom of a Christian’, a speech by Martin Luther. To which extent can one identify either Scheler’s or Nietzsche’s understanding of resentment in The Freedom of a Christian?


Keywords


Resentment; Envy; Protestantism; Martin Luther; Nietzsche; Scheler; Christianity

Full Text:

PDF

References


Birns, N. (n.d.). Ressentiment and Counter-Ressentiment: Nietzsche, Scheler, and the Reaction Against Equality. Nietzsche Circle. Retrieved from http://nietzschecircle.com/RessentimentMaster.pdf

Durkheim, E. (2006). On Suicide. London: Penguin.

Klauser, F. (2010). Rage, Time, and the Politico-Religious Revenge Banks. The Berlin Review of Books. Retrieved from http://berlinbooks.org/brb/2010/12/rage-and-time/

Luther, M. (1520). Von der Freiheit eines Christenmenschen. Der Spiegel Projekt Guthenberg: Martin Luther (6). Retrieved from http://gutenberg.spiegel.de/buch/martin-luther-sonstige-texte-270/6

Luther, M. (1520). On the Freedom of a Christian. Luther 2017: 500 Jahre Reformation. Retrieved from https://www.luther2017.de/en/martin-luther/texts-sources/on-the-freedom-of-a-christian/

Luther, M. (1999). Luther’s Works. Career of the Reformer (Vol. 31). J. J. Pelikan, H. C. Oswald & H. T. Lehmann (Ed.). Philadelphia: Fortress Press.

Meltzer, B. N. & Musolf, G. R. (2002). Resentment and Ressentiment. Sociological Inquiry, 72(2), 240-255. doi: 10.1111/1475-682X.00015

Morelli, E. M. (n.d.). Ressentiment and Rationality. Loyola Marymount University. Retrieved from https://www.bu.edu/wcp/Papers/Anth/AnthMore.htm

Nietzsche, F. (1887). Zur Genealogie der Moral. Eine Streitschrift. Leipzig: Verlag von C.G. Neumann.

Palmer, R. R., Colton, J. G. & Kramer, L. S. (2007). A History of the Modern World (10th Ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

Riou, J. & Gallagher, M. (2016). Re-thinking Ressentiment: On the Limits of Criticism and the Limits of its Critics. Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag.

Rowland, I. D. (2017). Martin Luther’s Burning Questions. The New York Review of Books. Retrieved from http://www.nybooks.com/articles/2017/06/08/martin-luthers-burning-questions/

Scheler, M. (1994). Ressentiment. Milwaukee: Marquette University Press.

Sloterdijk, P. (2006). Zorn und Zeit. Politisch-Psychologischer Versuch. Berlin: Suhrkamp.

Tocqueville, A. de (2003). Democracy in America. And two essays on America. London: Penguin.

Weber, M. (2005). The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. Abingdon: Routledge.

Weber, M. (2011). Religion und Gesellschaft. Frankfurt am Main: Dörfler.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26481/marble.2017.v3.553

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.