Toward a Surveillance Society? Issues of Privacy and Surveillance in the Bundestag Debates

Iana Gein

Abstract


This study has analysed the frames related to privacy and surveillance in the Bundestag debates in the period between 2014-2017. By performing the inductive framing analysis of the Parliamentary protocols this research identified three privacy and three surveillance frames. The analysis has shown what frames are used by the grand coalition, which has the most influence on the legislative outcome, as well as the opposition in the Bundestag. As a result, it revealed the goals German politicians pursue in relation to privacy and surveillance. One of the main findings is that privacy is discussed less often than surveillance, and is mainly presented as personal data. The dominant privacy frame discusses privacy as threatened by the flawed technologies and unsecure data sharing practices. Another important finding is that the grand coalition considers freedoms and security as conflicting rights that should be brought into balance. As evidence of this approach, one of the surveillance frames interprets surveillance as a democratic response to security issues. However, the dominant surveillance frame portrays surveillance as an excessive practice of national secret services. The most important is that this study has identified the shift how politicians portray surveillance. In the beginning of 2014, due to Snowden’s revelations about the USA’s global surveillance practices, surveillance was intensively discussed as an anti-democratic practice of foreign secret services. However, after the attack on Charlie Hebdo in January 2015, Bundestag members present surveillance as an acceptable democratic tool to ensure security and prevent terrorism. 


Keywords


Inductive framing, parliamentary debates, privacy, surveillance, the Bundestag

Full Text:

PDF

References


Barnard-Wills, D. (2013). Security, privacy and surveillance in European policy documents. International Data Privacy Law, 3(3), 170-180.

Bauman, Z., Bigo, D., Esteves, P., Guild, E., Jabri, V., Lyon, D., Walker, R. (2014). After Snowden: Rethinking the Impact of Surveillance. International Political Sociology, 8(2), 121-144.

Bennett, C. (2011). In defence of privacy: the concept and the regime. Surveillance & Society, 8(4), 485- 96.

Bessire, D. (2005). Transparency: a two-way mirror? International Journal of Social Economics, 32(5), 424-438.

The Bundestag (2017). Mehr Videoüberwachung soll zu mehr Sicherheit beitragen. (2017, January 27). Retrieved from https://www.bundestag.de/dokumente/textarchiv/2017/kw04-de- bundespolizei/489468

Callaghan, K., & Schnell, F. (2009). Who says what to whom: Why messengers and citizen beliefs matter in social policy framing. The Social Science Journal, 46(1), 12–28.

Chase, J. (26 June 2017). Things to know about Germany's recent surveillance laws. Deutsche Welle. Retrieved from http://p.dw.com/p/2fPDY

Chong, D., & Druckman, J. N. (2007). Framing Theory. Annual Review of Political Science, 10(1), 103- 126.

Davier, F., (2007). Policy framing in the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy, 14(4), 654- 666.

van Dijck, J. (2014). Datafication, dataism and dataveillance: Big Data between scientific paradigm and ideology. Surveillance & Society, 12(2), 197-208.

Druckman, J., & Nelson, K. (2003). Framing and Deliberation: How Citizens' Conversations Limit Elite Influence. American Journal of Political Science, 47(4), 729-745.

Edgar, T. (2017). Beyond Snowden. “Privacy, Mass Surveillance, and the Struggle to Reform the NSA”. Washington: The Brooking Institution.

The European Union (2000). Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. The Official Journal of the European Communities. Retrieved from

http://www .europarl.europa.eu/charter/pdf/text_en.pdf

Entman, R. (1993). Framing: toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51-58.

Fischer, F. (2003). Reframing Public Policy: Discursive Politics and Deliberative Practices. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Fitzpatrick, T. (2005). New Theories of Welfare. Houndmills: Palgrave.

Foucault, M. (1984). The Order of Discourse. In Language and Politics, edited by M. J. Shapiro.

Oxford: Blackwell.

Friedewald, M., van Lieshout, M., Rung S., Ooms M., & Ypma J. (2015) Privacy and Security Perceptions of European Citizens: A Test of the Trade-Off Model. In: Camenisch J., Fischer- Hübner S., Hansen M. (Eds.) Privacy and Identity Management for the Future Internet in the Age of Globalisation (p.39-53). Springer, Cham.

Friedewald, M., Finn, R., Wright, D. (2013). European Data Protection: Coming of Age. Chapter: Seven Types of Privacy. Publisher: Springer.

Gamson, W., & Modigliani, A. (1989). Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: A constructionist approach. American Journal of Sociology, 95(1), 1-37.

Germany, Bundestag, Plenarprotokoll 18/10, (2014, January 29). Retrieved from

http://dipbt.bundestag.de/doc/btp/18/18010.pdf

Germany, Bundestag, Plenarprotokoll 18/93, (2015, March 18). Retrieved from

http://dipbt.bundestag.de/doc/btp/18/18093.pdf

Germany, Bundestag, Plenarprotokoll 18/131, (2015, October 16). Retrieved from

http://dip21.bundestag.de/dip21/btp/18/18131.pdf

Germany, Bundestag, Plenarprotokoll 18/139, (2015, November 25). Retrieved from

http://dipbt.bundestag.de/doc/btp/18/18139.pdf

Germany, Bundestag, Plenarprotokoll 18/180, (2016, June 24). Retrieved from

http://dipbt.bundestag.de/doc/btp/18/18180.pdf

Germany, Bundestag, Plenarprotokoll 18/216, (2017, January 27). Retrieved from

https://dipbt.bundestag.de/doc/btp/18/18216.pdf

The German constitutional Court (1993). Ruling defining informational self-determination. Retrieved from

http://sorminiserv.unibe.ch:8080/tools/ainfo.exe?Command=ShowPrintText&Name=bv065 001

Gross, K., & D’Ambrosio, L. (2004). Framing emotional response. Political Psychology, 25(1), 1-29.

Hallahan, K. (2008). Strategic Framing. International Encyclopedia of Communication. Retrieved from http://www.pitt.edu/~mitnick/MESM10/HallahanStrategicFramingHallahan_ICE_051507.p df

Hansen, H., Christensen, L., Flyverbom, M. (2015). Introduction: Logics of transparency in late modernity: Paradoxes, mediation and governance. European Journal of Social Theory, 18(2), 117- 131.

Heald, D. (2006). Varieties of transparency. Proceedings of the British Academy, 135, 25-43.

Iyengar, S., & Simon, A. (1993). News coverage of the Gulf crisis and public opinion. A study of

agenda-setting, priming and framing. Communication Research, 20(3), 365-383.

Lee, Y., & Chang, C. (2010). Framing public policy: The impacts of political sophistication and

nature of public policy. The Social Science Journal, 47, 69-89.

Lubin, A. (9 January 2017). A New Era of Mass Surveillance is Emerging Across Europe. Just Security. Retrieved from https://www.justsecurity.org/36098/era-mass-surveillance- emerging- europe/

Lyon (2003). Surveillance as social sorting. Privacy, risk, and digital discrimination. UK: Routledge.

Lyon, D. (2015). Surveillance after Snowden. UK: Polity Press.

Matthes, J., & Kohring, M. (2008). The content analysis of media frames: Toward improving reliability and validity. Journal of Communication, 58(2), 258-279.

Orwell, G. (1949). 1984. UK: Secker & Warburg.

Price, V., & Tewksbury, D. (1997). News value and public opinion: A theoretical account of media priming an framing. In G. Barnett, & H. Sawhney (Eds.) Progress in the communication sciences (pp. 173–212). Greenwic CT: Ablex.

Rein, M., & Schön, D. (1991). ‘Frame-reflective policy discourse’, in P. Wagner (Ed.) Social Sciences and Modern States: National Experiences and Theoretical Crossroads (p.262-829). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Raley, R. (2013). Dataveillance and Counterveilance. In L. Gitelman (Ed.) „Raw Data“ is an Oxymoron, (p.121-146). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Stalder, F. (2002). Privacy is not the Antidote to Surveillance. Surveillance and Society, 1, 120-124. Schmitter, P. (1992). Representation in the future euro-polity. Staatswissenschaften und Staatspraxis, 3(3), 379-405.

Taylor, L. (2017). What is data justice? The case for connecting digital rights and freedoms globally.

Big Data & Society, 1(14), 1-14.

Touri M., & Koteyko, N. (2015). Using corpus linguistic software in the extraction of news frames: towards a dynamic process of frame analysis in journalistic texts. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 18(6), 601-616.

The United Nations (1948). The Universal Declaration of Human Right. Retrieved from

http://www.un.org/en/universal-declaration-human-rights/

The United Nations General Assembly (1948). The Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Retrieved from http://www.un.org/en/universal-declaration-human-rights/

Van Gorp, B. (2005). Where is the frame? Victims and intruders in the Belgian press coverage of the asylum issue. European Journal of Communication, 20(4), 484-507.

Van Gorp, B. (2010) Strategies to Take Subjectivity Out of Framing Analysis. In D'Angelo, P., & Kuypers, J. A. (Eds.) Doing news framing analysis: Empirical and theoretical perspectives. London: Routledge.

Yanow, D. (2000). Conducting Interpretative Policy Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26481/marble.2018.v4.639

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.