Management Control System Design: Conditional Interdependencies between Behavioral Constraints, Incentives and Employee Selection
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26481/marble.2015.v2.97Abstract
My research contributes to the understanding of management control system design. Despite ongoing relevance and over 30 years of research there is still a limited understanding about the interdependence of management control. In this paper I analyze the interdependencies of behavioral constraints, incentives and employee selection under differing degrees of task uncertainty and output immeasurability. I find that in situations characterized by low task uncertainty and low output immeasurability employee selection and behavioral constraints act as substitutes. In a low task uncertainty/high output immeasurability context behavioral constraints and employee selection appear to act as substitutes. In a high task uncertainty/low output immeasurability setting there appear to be no significant interdependence effects between behavioral constraints, incentives and employee selection. Lastly, given a high task uncertainty/high output immeasurability background I find that incentives and employee selection act as complements and employee selection and behavioral constraints are substitutes. In addition to contextual factors managers have to take these interdependencies into account when designing optimal management control systems in order to achieve both external fit and internal consistency.
References
Abernethy, M. A., & Brownell, P. (1997). Management control systems in research and development organizations: The role of accounting, behavior and personnel controls. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 22(3/4), 233-248.
Anthony, R. N. (1988). The Management Control Function. Boston, MA: The Harvard Business School Press.
Armstrong, J. S., & Overton, T. S. (1977). Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. Journal of Marketing Research, 14, 396-402.
Arora, A., & Gambardella, A. (1990). Complementarity and External Linkages: The Strategies of the Large Firms in Biotechnology. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 38(4), 361-379.
Baiman, S. (1990). Agency research in managerial accouting: A second look. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 15(4), 341-371.
Campbell, D. (2012). Employee Selection as a Control System. Journal of Accounting Research, 50(4), 931-966.
Chenhall, R. H. (2003). Management control systems design within its organizational context: findings from contingency-based research and directions for the future. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 28(2/3), 127-168.
Churchill, G. A. (1979). A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs. Journal of Marketing Research, 16(1), 64-73.
Davila, A., Foster, G., & Oyon, D. (2009). Accounting and Control, Entrepreneurship and Innovation: Venturing into New Research Opportunities. European Accounting Review, 18(2), 281-311.
Deckop, J. R., Mangel, R., & Cirka, C. C. (1999). Getting More Than You Pay For: Organizational Citizenship Behavior and Pay-For-Performance Plans. Academy of Management Journal, 42(4), 420-428.
Grabner, I. (2014). Incentive design in creativity-dependent firms. The Accounting Review, forthcoming.
Grabner, I., & Moers, F. (2013). Management control as a system or as a package? Conceptual and empirical issues. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 38, 407-419.
Harrison, G. L., & McKinnon, J. L. (1999). Cross-cultural research in management control systems. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 24(5/6), 483-506.
Malmi, T., & Brown, D. A. (2008). Management control systems as a package - Opportunities, challenges and research directions. Management Accounting Research, 19(4), 287-300.
Merchant, K. A., & Van der Stede, W. A. (2007). Management Control Systems: Performance Measurement, Evaluation and Incentives (2nd ed.). Harlow: Financial Times/Prentice Hall.
Milgrom, P., & Roberts, J. (1992). Economics, Organization and Management. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Milgrom, P., & Roberts, J. (1995). Complementarities and fit: Strategy, structure, and organizational change in manufacturing. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 19(2/3), 179-208.
Moers, F. (2006). Performance Measure Properties and Delegation. The Accounting Review, 81(4), 897-924.
Nagar, V. (2002). Delegation and Incentive Compensation. The Accounting Review, 77(2), 379-395.
Ouchi, W. G. (1979). A Conceptual Framework for the Design of Organizational Control Mechanisms. Management Science, 25(9), 833-848.
Podsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W. (1986). Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management, 12(4), 531-544.
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879-903.
Prendergast, C. (2008). Intrinsic Motivation and Incentives. The American Economic Review, 98(2), 201-205.
Simons, R. (2000). Performance Measurement & Control Systems for Implementing Strategy. Upper Saddle River, N.J: Prentice Hall.
Snell, S. A. (1992). Control theory in strategic human resource management: The mediating effect of administrative information. Academy of Management Journal, 35(2), 292-327.
Wright, P. M., Dunford, B. B., & Snell, S. A. (2001). Human resources and the resource based view of the firm. Journal of Management, 27(6), 701-721.
