Wise men, clear guidance and the Common Statute for the Members of the European Parliament. An argumentative Analysis.

Authors

  • Frederike Kaltheuner

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26481/marble.2011.v1.111

Abstract

To set the context for the more technical argumentative analysis, the Common Statute for the Members of the European Parliament will be introduced with its historical background. In the following methodology section, the Toulmin model of argumentation will be explained briefly. The main part consists of an argumentative analysis of “The Recommendation of the Group of Eminent Persons”, the most important document in the context of the Common Statute. The arguments will be reconstructed and evaluated separately. The paper concludes with a resume and critical evaluation of the findings.

References

Barzanti, “Debate on Rothley Report A4-0426/98”. In European Union. Parliament. Debates. (December 2, 1998) (e-mail to author from DG1 Archives CARDOC, 22.03.2010)

Burrows, N. Equal Pay for Equal Work: The Impact of European Law draft. http://ec.europa.eu/education/programmes/llp/jm/more/confgender03/burrows.pdf

Decision of the European Parliament of 28 September 2005 adopting the Statute for Members of the European Parliament (2005/684/EC, Euratom), in Official Journal of the European Union (OJEU). 7.10.2005, No L 262, p. 1.

European Parliament – An Overview, “Parliament’s Powers and Procedures”, The European Parliament, http://www.europarl.europa.eu/parliament/public/staticDisplay.do?language =EN&id=46

European Parliament, Resolution on the draft Statute for Members of the European Parliament (3 December 1998): A4-0426/98, in Official Journal of the European Communities (OJEC). 21.12.1998, No C 398, p. 24. Paragraph 2.

European Parliament resolution on the adoption of a Statute for Members of the European Parliament (4 June 2003): P5_TA(2003)0241, in Official Journal of the European Union (OJEU). 18.3.2004, No C 68 E, p. 210.

Gonzalés, S. (1998, December 2). Debate on Rothley Report A4-0426/98. In European Union. Parliament. Debates. (e-mail to author from DG1 Archives CARDOC, 22.03.2010).

Gosepath, S. (2007). Equality. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/equality/ (accessed june 10, 2010).

Hoeren, D. (2004, March 30). Im Namen des deutschen Steuerzahlers. EU Abzocker! Was antwortet ihr auf diesen Brief? Bild. http://www.bild.t-online.de/BTO/news//2004/03/30/ eu_abzocker.html

Keohane, R. Nye, J. (1977). Power and Interdependence: World Politics in Transition. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.

McLeod, O. (2002). Desert. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/desert/ (accessed june 10, 2010).

Oppenheim, F. (1970). Egalitarianism as a Descriptive Concept. American Philosophical Quarterly, 7, 143-152.

Peter, F. (2010). Political Legitimacy. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/legitimacy/ (accessed june 10, 2010).

Rawls, J. (1971). Political Liberalism. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Raz, J. (1986). The Morality of Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Rothley, W. Debate on Rothley Report A4-0426/98. In European Union. Parliament.

Downloads

Published

2011-07-01