Supplier Innovation Drivers: Enabling the creative supplier to award the entire supply chain a competitive edge
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26481/marble.2013.v6.188Abstract
The importance of added value stemming from supplier involvement during the innovation process of New Product Development has been highlighted by academics, press releases, and expert opinions. For businesses it is relevant to know how the innovation potential of their supplier can be accessed and developed. The focus of this paper, hence, is to provide a closer examination of the factors that buying firms can apply to encourage their suppliers to contribute value during the innovation process. A theoretical framework based on the findings of previous studies on the topic is developed. The model depicts what happens on both sides of the buyer-supplier relationship. A case study is designed and applied in order to investigate how the hypothesized factors and outcomes relate to reality. For this purpose a dual case design is chosen and implemented with a pair of firms which find themselves in a vivid buyer-supplier relationship with innovation efforts at the time of the study. Following a close examination it is reflected on the findings of the case study in order to transfer the results into managerial as well as research implications. The case study depicts trust as an essential component of the investigated partnership. Trust is seen as the basis for granting autonomy, for sharing information and for investing in the relationship in order to develop long term commitment and for providing lasting value to both parties. Furthermore, formally ensuring commitment as well as providing communication and feedback devices have proven as vitally shaping the relationship of the two cases examined. The resulting innovations have the potential to provide a source of competitive advantage and to improve the cost structure of the entire supply chain.
References
Amabile, T. M., & Pillemer, J. (2012). Perspectives on the Social Psychology of Creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 46(1), 3-15.
Bakker, A., & Demerouti, E. (2007). The job demands- resources model: state of the art. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22(3), 309-328.
Barney, J. B., & Hesterly, W. S. (2009). Strategic Management and Competitive Advantage: Concepts and Cases (3rd edition). Pearson.
Burnard, P. (1991). A method of analyzing interview transcripts in qualitative research. Nurse Education today, 11, 461-466.
Dahlberg, S. (2007, June). Creative engagement. Presented at Supporting creative acts beyond dissemination. Creativity & Cognition, Washington DC, USA.
Day, A. (2011). How to be a customer of choice. CPO Agenda. Retrieved from: cpoagenda.com
Dul, J., Canan, C., & Ferdinand, J. (2012). Knowledge workers’ creativity and the role of the physical work environment. Human Resource Management, 50(6), 715-734. doi: 10.1002/ hrm.20454
Fryer, M. (2012). Some Key Issues in Creativity Research and Evaluation as Seen From a Psychological Perspective. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 21-28.
Grant, A., & Berry, J. (2011). The necessity of others is the mother of invention: Intrinsic and prosocial motivations, perspective taking, and creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 54(1), 73-96.
Henke, J., & Zhang, C. (2010). Increasing supplier driven innovation. MIT Sloan Management Review, 51(2), 40-46.
Johansson, J. (2003, September). Case study methodology. A key note speech at the International conference “Methodologies in Housing Research”. Stockholm, Sweden.
Kannan, V. (2003). Attitudes of US and European managers to supplier selection and assessment and implications for business performance. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 10(5), 472-489. doi: 10.1108/14635770310495519
Lubart, T.I. (2001). Models of the Creative Process: Past, Present and Future, Creativity Research Journal, 13(3-4), 295-308. doi: 10.1207/S15326934CRJ1334_07
McDonough Braungart Design Chemistry. (2013). Cradle to cradle certified program. Retrieved from http://www.mbdc.com/cradle-to-cradle/cradle-to-cradle-certified-program/
Mueller, J. (2009, November 16). Abfall ist nahrung. Zeit Online. Retrieved from http://www.zeit.de/2009/47/T-Cradle-to-Cradle
Parajanen, S. (2012). Experiencing creativity in the organization: From individual creativity to collective creativity. Interdisciplinary Journal of Information, Knowledge and Management, 7, 109-128.
Sloane, P. (2012, November 09). Does encouraging creativity in the workplace improve innovation? Innovation Management, Retrieved from http://www.innovationmanagement.se/2012/11/09/does-encouraging-creativity-in-the-workplace-improve-innovation/
Smals, R., & Smits, A. (2010). Value for value – how to make innovation oriented buyer-supplier relationships work. Informally published manuscript, MICORD research, Institute for Science, Innovation and Society, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
State of Flux Limited (2013). 2012 SRM Report - Overview of the key findings. Retrieved from http:// srm.stateofflux.co.uk/2012-srm-report-overview-of-the-key-findings/
Wagner, S. (2009). Getting innovation from suppliers. Research-Technology Management, 52(1).
Wagner, S. (2012). Tapping supplier innovation. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 48(2), 37-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1745493X.2011.03258.x
Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: design and methods (4 ed., Vol. 5). Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications, Inc.
