Predictors for HCV treatment outcome: lower limit of quantification vs. limit of detection

  • B.C.M. Conjaerts

Abstract

Introduction. In HCV treatment, the early on-treatment virological status is used as guideline for response guided therapy (RGT) and is the key predictor for a sustained virological response (SVR). The response to treatment (RT) is determined by HCV RNA results at week 4 and 12 of treatment. Being ‘undetectable’ at these time points, is a reliable predictor for reaching a SVR. To define an ‘undetectable’ HCV RNA, the lower limit of quantification (LOQ) and not the limit of detection (LOD) is used. This leaves a gray zone between the LOQ and the LOD, which results in a ‘detectable but no quantifiable’ (DNQ) HCV RNA to be reported as ‘undetectable’. The aim of this study is to analyse the reliability of using the LOQ at key decision time points, week 4 (Rapid viral response; RVR) and week 12 ( Early viral response; EVR) to predict treatment outcome. Methods. Retrospective analysis of the response to therapy, treatment outcome and SVR of patients treated for HCV. In the period Oct 2012 – Apr 2013, HCV RNA samples were conducted at week 4, 12, end of treatment (EOT) and 24 weeks after treatment and tested with the Ampliprep/Cobas-Taqman_HCV-test-v1.0. (Limit of detection; LOD: 15 IU/ml, Lower limit of quantification; LOQ: 43 IU/ml). Results. In total, 19 patients were treated, of which 10 relapsed and 9 cleared the virus. In both treatment outcome groups, DNQ HCV RNA statuses were observed. Treatment outcome showed no relation between having a DNQ during treatment (p=0,350) or at decision time points, 4th week (p=0,167) or 12th week (p=0,474). In contrast, a on-treatment viral status >LOQ and <LOD showed a relation with treatment outcome at week 4 (p=0,007), but not at week 12 (p=0,474). In addition, the response to therapy (RVR or EVR) showed a relation with reaching SVR (p=0,023), which was not influenced by the on-treatment viral status; DNQ. Conclusion. Reaching an ‘undetectable’ HCV RNA result at week 4 and/or week 12, is not always a guarantee of achieving SVR. In our study, being ‘detectable but not quantifiable’ at decision time point does not give a higher incidence of relapsing. The HCV RNA being ‘detectable but not quantifiable’ does not influence the predictive value of a Rapid or Early viral response. Therefore, our study suggests that no alterations in the decision-rules for HCV guidelines have to be carried out.

References

Andre P, Komurian-Pradel F, Deforges S, Perret M, Berland JL, Sodoyer M, et al. Characterization of low- and very-low-density hepatitis C virus RNA-containing particles. Journal of virology. 2002 Jul;76(14):69-28.

Agnello V, Abel G, Elfahal M, Knight GB, Zhang QX. Hepatitis C virus and other flaviviridae viruses enter cells via low density lipoprotein receptor. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1999 Oct 26;96(22):12766-71. PubMed PMID: 10535997. Pubmed Central PMCID: 23090.

Coller KE, Heaton NS, Berger KL, Cooper JD, Saunders JL, Randall G. Molecular determinants and dynamics of hepatitis C virus secretion. PLoS pathogens. 2012 Jan;8(1):e1002466. PubMed PMID: 22241992. Pubmed Central PMCID: 3252379.

Lavanchy D. Evolving epidemiology of hepatitis C virus. Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. 2011 Feb;17(2):107-15. PubMed PMID: 21091831.

Vriend HJ, Van Veen MG, Prins M, Urbanus AT, Boot HJ, Op De Coul EL. Hepatitis C virus prevalence in The Netherlands: migrants account for most infections. Epidemiology and infection. 2013 Jun;141(6):1310-7. PubMed PMID: 22963908.

McCombs JS, Yuan Y, Shin J, Saab S. Economic burden associated with patients diagnosed with hepatitis C. Clinical therapeutics. 2011 Sep;33(9):1268-80. PubMed PMID: 21840056.

Ghany MG, Nelson DR, Strader DB, Thomas DL, Seeff LB, American Association for Study of Liver D. An update on treatment of genotype 1 chronic hepatitis C virus infection: 2011 practice guideline by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. Hepatology. 2011 Oct;54(4):1433-44. PubMed PMID: 21898493. Pubmed Central PMCID: 3229841.

Yang JH, Lai JP, Douglas SD, Metzger D, Zhu XH, Ho WZ. Real-time RT-PCR for quantitation of hepatitis C virus RNA. Journal of virological methods. 2002 Apr;102(1-2):119-28. PubMed PMID: 11879700.

Maasoumy B, Cobb B, Bremer B, Luk K, Halfon P, Aslam S, et al. Detection of low HCV viraemia by repeated HCV RNA testing predicts treatment failure to triple therapy with telaprevir. Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics. 2014 Jan;39(1):85-92. PubMed PMID: 24206524.

Harrington PR, Zeng W, Naeger LK. Clinical relevance of detectable but not quantifiable hepatitis C virus RNA during boceprevir or telaprevir treatment. Hepatology. 2012 Apr;55(4):1048-57. PubMed PMID: 22095516.

Yu JW, Wang GQ, Sun LJ, Li XG, Li SC. Predictive value of rapid virological response and early virological response on sustained virological response in HCV patients treated with pegylated interferon alpha-2a and ribavirin. Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology. 2007 Jun;22(6):832-6. PubMed PMID: 17565637.

Gupta E, Bajpai M, Choudhary A. Hepatitis C virus: Screening, diagnosis, and interpretation of laboratory assays. Asian journal of transfusion science. 2014 Jan;8(1):19-25. PubMed PMID: 24678168. Pubmed Central PMCID: 3943138.

Roche Molecular Systems. COBAS AmpliPrep/COBAS TaqMan HCV Test Package Insert. 2008. Available from: http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/cdrh_docs/pdf6/P060030c.pdf.

Sulkowski MS, Gardiner DF, Rodriguez-Torres M, Reddy KR, Hassanein T, Jacobson I, et al. Daclatasvir plus sofosbuvir for previously treated or untreated chronic HCV infection. The New England journal of medicine. 2014 Jan 16;370(3):211-21. PubMed PMID: 24428467.

Published
2016-11-29