The influence of dogs on the physical activity and social network of the owners: A qualitative study.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26481/marble.2015.v6.377Abstract
The effect of dog ownership on the physical activity and social network of the owners is getting more attention nowadays. Dogs may be able to positively influence risk factors for preventing non-communicable diseases. The basis for this qualitative study is mainly established on a literature study and the data gathered is derived from two focus group interviews followed by six detailed individual interviews. From the gathered data it can be concluded that the influence of dogs on the physical activity and social network needs to be viewed from a comprehensive framework based on three environments: the social, physical and policy environment. Besides the main environmental structures, a more in depth structure can be seen to influence the intention to walk and social network. The characteristics of the dog, the characteristics of the owner, the personal beliefs and the bond between owner and dog, are mentioned to influence the key perceptions. These key perceptions are the motivation and obligation to walk with the dog, the social support provided by the dog and the perceived barriers and benefits. Dogs are said to be able to positively influence these perceptions of the owner, which enables dogs to maintain the owners’ walking behavior. The point that dogs can positively influence some key factors of current mental and physical health problems, raises the possibility to develop a dog intervention. Both owners and non-owners may benefit from dog interventions. However before starting with the development of an intervention, it is important to examine the needs of the population. A needs assessment study would be a good first step in the development process of a dog intervention and if the results are positive, a concrete plan for a dog intervention can be made.References
Allen, D.T. (1997). Effects of dogs on human health. American Veterinary Medical Association, 210, 1136- 1139.
Brug J., van Assema P., & Lechner L. (2007). Gezondheidsvoorlichting en gedragsverandering: Een planmatige aanpak. Assen: Van Gorcum
Christian, H.E., Westgarth, C., Bauman, A., Richards, E.A., Rhodes, R., & Evenson, K.R. (2013). Dog ownership and physical activity: a review of the evidence. Journal of physical activity & health, 10, 750-759.
Feng, Z., Dibben, C., Witham, M. D., Donnan, P. T., Vadiveloo, T., Sniehotta, F., Crombie, L. K., & McMurdo, M. E. T. (2014). Dog ownership and physical activity in later life: A cross-sectional observational study. Preventive Medicine, 66, 101-106.
Giles-Corti, B., Timperio, A., Cutt, H., Pikora, T. J., Bull, F. C., Knuiman, M., Bulsara, M., Van Niel, K., & Shilton, T. (2006). Development of a reliable measure of walking within and outside the local neighborhood: RESIDE’s Neighborhood Physical Activity Questionnaire. Preventive Medicine, 42, 455–459.
Hoeven, Van, der, M. (2012). Walk, stop and exchange method. Retrieved, 19, 02, 2015, from, http://www. dalton-drieluik.nl/Portals/LINHAA/Drieluik/docs/Dalton%20brochure%20samenwerkenLR.pdf
Humpel, N., Owen, N., & Leslie, E. (2002). Environmental factors associated with adults’ participation in physical activity: A review. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 22(3), 188-199.
Mackenbach, J. P., & van der Maas, J. P. (2008). Volksgezondheid en gezondheidszorg. 4dedruk. Maarssen: Elsevier Gezondheidszorg.
McDonnell, L. (2012). Qualitative Data Analysis using NVivo9. Social Work and Social care. University of Sussex.
Westgarth, C., Christley, R., & Christian, H. E. (2014). How might we increase physical activity through dog walking?: A comprehensive review of dog walking correlates. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 11, 83-97.
WHO (2003). Investing in mental health. Retrieved, 19,02,2015, from, http://www.who.int/mental_health/media/investing_mnh.pdf
