The impact of science-based knowledge on attitudes towards sex offenders
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26481/marble.2015.v6.385Abstract
Background. The general public often holds negative attitudes towards sex offenders, which could result in an exclusion of sex offenders from society. Since lack of social support is a known risk factor for relapse, it is highly desirable that interventions target to reduce the negativity of attitudes against sex offenders. Therefore, the current study aims at exploring the effectiveness of an intervention based on the provision of in-depth scientific knowledge on existing attitudes and degree of dehumanization towards sex offenders in undergraduates that are expected to work with sex offenders in their future careers. Methods. A non-randomized experimental study was conducted, involving an experimental group (n = 9) and a control group (n = 5). In a pre- and posttest measurement participants’ attitudes and degree of dehumanization towards sex offenders were measured. During the interval, the experimental group took a four-week course about sex offending, wherein in-depth scientific knowledge was provided, whereas the control group received no scientific information. Comparisons were made between the attitudes towards sex offenders, and between the degree of dehumanization towards sex offenders, between the pre- and post-test measurement within and between the participant groups. Results. A significant difference was found for attitudes between the pre- and post-test measurement within the experimental group. The degree of dehumanization towards sex offenders has not decreased during the intervention within both participant groups. Conclusion. This study suggests that in-depth scientific knowledge has a positive influence on attitudes towards sex offenders, but not on the degree of dehumanization in future professionals within the field of forensics and psychology. However, the study’s small sample size suggests for more extensive research on the subject. Nevertheless, the present findings provide a method for the improvement of treatment and rehabilitation of sex offenders by influencing impeding, negative attitudes.References
Brouwers, M., & Smit, P. R. (2005). Seksuele delinquentie: De prevalentie door de jaren heen. Justitiële Verkenningen, 3(1), 37-44.
Church II, W. T., Wakeman, E. E., Miller, S. L., Clements, C. B., & Sun, F. (2008). The community attitudes toward sex offenders scale: The development of a psychometric assessment instrument. Research on Social Work Practice, 18(3), 251-259. doi: 10.1177/1049731507310193
Costello, K., & Hodson, G. (2009). Exploring the roots of dehumanization: The role of animal-human similarity in promoting immigrant humanization. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 13(1), 3-22. doi:10.1177/1368430209347725
Craig, L. A. (2005). The impact of training on attitudes towards sex offenders. Journal of Sexual Aggression: An International, Interdisciplinary Forum for Research, Theory and Practice, 11(2), 197-207. doi:10.1080/13552600500172103
Crowne, D. P., & Marlowe, D. (1960). A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 24(4), 349-354.
Furby, L., Weinrott, M. R., & Blackshaw, L. (1989). Sex offender recidivism: A review. Psychological Bulletin, 105(1), 3-30.
Hanson, R. K., & Morton-Bourgon, K. E. (2005). The characteristics of persistent sexual offenders: A meta-analysis of recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73(6), 1154-1163. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.73.6.1154
Haslam, N. (2006). Dehumanization: An integrative review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10(3), 252-264. doi: 10.1207/s15327957pspr1003_4
Hogue, T. E. (1993). Attitudes towards prisoners and sexual offenders. In G. M. Stephenson, and N. K. Clark (Eds.), Issues in Criminological and Legal Psychology, No. 19 (pp. 27-32). Leicester: British Psychological Society
Hogue, T. E., & Peebles, J. (1997). The influence of remorse, intent and attitudes toward sex offenders on judgment of a rapist, Psychology, Crime & Law, 3(4), 249-259. doi: 10.1080/10683169708410821
Huebner, B. M., Kras, K. R., Rydberg, J., Bynum, T. S., Grommon, E., & Pleggenkuhle, B. (2014). The effect and implications of sex offender residence restrictions. Criminology & Public Policy, 13(1), 139-168. doi: 10.1111/1745-9133.12066
Jeglic, E. L., Mercado, C. C., & Levenson, J. S. (2012). The prevalence and correlates of depression and hopelessness among sex offenders subject to community notification and residence restriction legislation. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 37(1), 46-59. doi: 10.1007/s12103-010-9096-9
Johnson, H., Hughes, J. G., & Ireland, J. (2007). Attitudes towards sex offenders and the role of empathy, locus of control and training: A comparison between a probationer police and general public sample. The Police Journal, 80, 28-54.
Kleban, H., & Jeglic, E. (2011). Dispelling the myths: Can psychoeducation change public attitudes towards sex offenders? Journal of Sexual Aggression: An International, Interdisciplinary Forum for Research, Theory and Practice, 18(2), 179-193. doi: 10.1080/13552600.2011.552795
Lea, S., Auburn, T., & Kibblewhite, K. (1999). Working with sex offenders: The perceptions and experiences of professionals and paraprofessionals. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 43(1), 103-119.
Maastricht University (2015). Sex offenders. Retrieved 22 April, 2015, from: http://www.maastrichtuniversity.nl/web/Faculties/PsychologyAndNeuroscience/TargetGroup/ProspectiveStudents/MastersProgrammes/ForensicPsychology/CourseDescriptions.htm
Sample, L. L., & Bray, T. M. (2006). Are sex offenders different? An examination of rearrest patterns. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 17(1), 83-102. doi: 10.1177/0887403405282916
Schönberger, H. J. M., & Kogel de, C. H. (2012). Kenmerken en recidivecijfers van ex-terbeschikkinggestelden met een zedendelict. Den Haag: Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek en Documentatie Centrum (WODC).
Viki, G. T., Fullerton, I., Raggett, H., Tait, F., & Wiltshire, S. (2012). The role of dehumanization in attitudes toward the social exclusion and rehabilitation of sex offenders. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 42(10), 2349-2367. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2012.00944.x
Viki, G. T., Winchester, L., Titshall, L., Chisango, T., Pina, A., & Russel, R. (2006). Beyond secondary emotions: The infrahumanization of outgroups using human-related and animal-related words. Social Cognition, 24(6), 753-775.
Ward, T., & Beech, A. (2006). An integrated theory of sexual offending. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 11(1), 44-63.
Waytz, A., Epley, N., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2010). Social cognition unbound: Insights into anthropomorphism and dehumanization. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19(1), 58-62. doi: 10.1177/0963721409359302
