The anticue task: no effect of working memory load on inhibitory control
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26481/marble.2015.v6.386Abstract
Several studies have reported a close link between inhibitory control and working memory (WM), however the exact mechanisms remain elusive. The present study was designed to investigate the effect of WM load on inhibitory control using a novel paradigm – the anticue keypress task. 22 right-handed students (21.0 ± 1.2 years; 11 males) performed four counterbalanced dual-task conditions on a computer: (pro- / anticue) x (high / low WM load). Three randomized preparation intervals, i.e. 150, 250 and 450 ms, separated cue and target onsets in all reaction time trials. No interaction was observed for the factor WM load with the pro- or anticue task, F(1, 21) = .21, p = .65. In conclusion, no distinctive influence of WM load on inhibitory control (anticue) compared to automatic response selection (procue) was found. Therefore, it is suggested that independent neural areas underlie WM performance and inhibitory control.References
Baddeley A. Working memory. Science. 1992;255(5044):556-9.
Miller J. Discrete versus continuous stage models of human information processing: in search of partial output. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1982;8(2):273-96.
Adam JJ, Ament B, Hurks P. Response preparation with anticues in children and adults. J Cogn Psychol. 2011;23(2):264-71.
Adam JJ, van Houdt H, Scholtissen B, Visser-Vandewalle V, Winogrodzka A, Duits A. Executive control in Parkinson’s disease: effects of dopaminergic medication and deep brain stimulation on anti-cue keypress performance. Neurosci Lett. 2011;500(2):113-7.
Ridderinkhof KR. Activation and suppression in conflict tasks: empirical clarification through distributional analyses. Attention Perform. 2002;19:494-519.
Aron AR, Robbins TW, Poldrack RA. Inhibition and the right inferior frontal cortex. Trends Cogn Sci. 2004;8(4):170-7.
Aron AR, Robbins TW, Poldrack RA. Inhibition and the right inferior frontal cortex: one decade on. Trends Cogn Sci. 2014;18(4):177-85.
Majid DS, Cai W, Corey-Bloom J, Aron AR. Proactive selective response suppression is implemented via the basal ganglia. J Neurosci. 2013;33(33):13259-69.
Qi S, Zeng Q, Luo Y, Duan H, Ding C, Hu W, et al. Impact of working memory load on cognitive control in trait anxiety: an ERP study. PLoS One. 2014;9(11):e111791.
Fegen D, Buchsbaum BR, D’Esposito M. The effect of rehearsal rate and memory load on verbal working memory. Neuroimage. 2015;105:120-31.
Barbey AK, Koenigs M, Grafman J. Dorsolateral prefrontal contributions to human working memory. Cortex. 2013;49(5):1195-205.
Berggren N, Hutton SB, Derakshan N. The effects of self-report cognitive failures and cognitive load on antisaccade performance. Front Psychol. 2011;2:280.
Roberts RJ, Hager LD, Heron C. Prefrontal Cognitive Processes: Working Memory and Inhibition in the Antisaccade Task. J Exp Psychol Gen. 1994;123(4):374-93.
Grandjean J, Collette F. Influence of response prepotency strength, general working memory resources, and specific working memory load on the ability to inhibit predominant responses: a comparison of young and elderly participants. Brain Cogn. 2011;77(2):237-47.
Waugh NC, Norman DA. Primary Memory. Psychol Rev. 1965;72:89-104.
Baddeley A. Working memory: looking back and looking forward. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2003;4(10):829-39.
Powell JL, Kemp GJ, Garcia-Finana M. Association between language and spatial laterality and cognitive ability: an fMRI study. Neuroimage. 2012;59(2):1818-29.
