The End of Privacy? Paradoxes and Dilemmas of Internet Use and Online Surveillance
AbstractWith the Internet growing in importance in our daily lives, concerns about privacy and data protection have emerged. While people worry about where they data may end up, they continue making themselves openly transparent by sharing information about themselves and their lives online. This study aims to understand the paradoxes between privacy considerations – mainly, the wish to keep individual data private and secure – and the actions that people undertake in reality. More specifically, it focuses on three paradoxes and dilemmas of privacy: age, perceived usefulness, and rewards. These will be studied by analyzing the results of a survey, in which respondents from the EU, North America and East Asia were asked about their online habits and their opinions on various security issues and privacy measures. The analysis ultimately aims to further the understanding of privacy paradoxes, and what hinders people from protecting their data sufficiently.
Blank, G., Bolsover, G. and Dubois, E. (2014). A New Privacy Paradox: Young people and privacy on social network sites. Global Cyber Security Capacity Centre. Oxford Internet Institute, University of Oxford.
Botsman, R. (2017). Big data meets Big Brother as China moves to rate its citizens. Retrieved from: http://www.wired.co.uk/article/chinese-government-social-credit-score-privacy-invasion
Brooker, C. (Producer). (2011). Black Mirror [Television series]. Los Gatos, California: Netflix.
Campbell, J.E. and Carlson, M. (2002). Panopticon.com: online surveillance and the commodification of privacy. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 46 (4): 586–606.
Castells, M. (2001). The Internet galaxy: Reflections on the Internet, business, and society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Chen, J. (2008). Playing with Surveillance. Retrieved from: http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/um/people/ast/chi/darkness/papers/chen.pdf
Child, J.T. and Petronio, S. (2011). Unpacking the Paradoxes of Privacy in CMC Relationships: The Challenges of Blogging and Relational Communication on the Internet. In: Wright, K.B. and Webb, L.M. Computer-Mediated Communication in Personal Relationships. (pp. 21-40). New York, NY: Lang.
DAA (n.d.) Americans Want Free Internet Content, Value Interest-Based Advertising. [Poll] Retrieved from http://www.aboutads.info/DAA-Zogby-Poll
Elmer, G. (1997). Spaces of surveillance: indexicality and solicitation on the Internet. Critical Studies in Mass Communication 14(2): 182–191.
Foucault, M. (1995). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. New York: Vintage.
Gangneux, J. (2014). Diverted and Diverting Glances at Cameras: Playful and Tactical Approaches to Surveillance. Surveillance & Society 12 (3): 443-447
Gladovic, M. (Producer) Meillassoux, M. (Director). (2017) Nothing to Hide [Documentary]. France/Germany. Retrieved at: https://vimeo.com/189016018
Johnson, B. (2009). Danah Boyd: 'People looked at me like I was an alien'. The Guardian [Interview]. Retrieved from: https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2009/dec/09/interview-microsoft-researcher-danah-boyd
Johnson, B. (2010). Privacy no longer a social norm, says Facebook founder. The Guardian. Retrieved from: https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2010/jan/11/facebook-privacy
Kemp, S. (2018). Digital in 2018: World’s internet users pass the 4 billion mark. We Are Social Special Report. Retrieved from: https://wearesocial.com/blog/2018/01/global-digital-report-2018
Koskela, H. and Mäkinen, L.A. (2016). Ludic encounters –understanding surveillance through game metaphors. Information, Communication & Society, 19:11, 1523-1538, DOI: 10.1080/1369118X.2015.1126330
Levi, M. and Wall, D.S. (2004) Technologies, Security, and Privacy in the Post-9/11 European Information Society. Journal of Law and Society, Vol. 31, No. 2
Lyon, D. (1994). The Electronic Eye: The Rise of Surveillance Society. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Lyon, D. (2001) Surveillance Society: Monitoring Everyday Life. Buckingham: Open
Mann, S., Nolan, J. & Wellman, B. (2003). Sousveillance: Inventing and Using Wearable Computing Devices for Data Collection in Surveillance Environments. Surveillance & Society 1(3 ):331- 355
Marx, G.T. (2006). Soft Surveillance: The Growth of Mandatory Volunteerism in Collecting Personal Information. In: Monahan, T. Surveillance and security: Technological politics and power in everyday life. (pp. 37-56). New York: Routledge.
Murphy, J. and Roser, M. (2018). "Internet". Published online at OurWorldInData.org. Retrieved from: https://ourworldindata.org/internet [Online Resource]
Norris, C. & Armstrong, G. (1999). The maximum surveillance society: The rise of CCTV. Oxford: Berg.
Solon, O. (2018). Facebook says Cambridge Analytica may have gained 37m more users' data. The Guardian. Retrieved from: https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2018/apr/04/facebook-cambridge-analytica-user-data-latest-more-than-thought
Taddicken, M. (2013). The ‘Privacy Paradox’ in the Social Web: The Impact of Privacy Concerns, Individual Characteristics, and the Perceived Social Relevance on Different Forms of Self-Disclosure. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 19 (2014) 248–273. doi:10.1111/jcc4.12052
Turow, J. (2005). Audience construction and culture production: marketing surveillance in the digital age. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 597 (1): 103–121.
Wall, D. (2006). Surveillant Internet technologies and the growth in information capitalism: spams and public trust in the information society. In: The new politics of surveillance and visibility, ed. Kevin Haggerty and Richard V. Ericson, 340–362. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Wong, M. (2017). Pizza Over Privacy? A Paradox of the Digital Age. Stanford Graduate School of Business. Retrieved from: https://www.gsb.stanford.edu/insights/pizza-over-privacy-paradox-digital-age
Zurawski, N. (2011). Local Practice and Global Data: Loyalty Cards, Social Practices, and Consumer Surveillance. The Sociological Quarterly, Vol. 52, No. 4 (fall 2011), pp. 509-527