A Submersion into Black Mirror’s Nosedive
Dredging Surveillance Theories to the Surface
AbstractThis study is the result of a rather unique approach to the MaRBLe programme. Filed with the desire to explore the relationship between academic writings on surveillance and elements of popular culture that concern themselves with the modern dimension of surveillance, the author sought the opportunity offered by this programme to illustrate such relationship in an unedited and pedagogical way. To do so, an audio-guide companion to one of the most illustrative episodes of Black Mirror pertaining to surveillance theories, i.e. Nosedive, has been developed. This episode displays what appears to be a rather fertile ground for the illustration of surveillance theories as it unfolds in a general atmosphere where the norm is to watch, as much as being watched. This paper, in the form of a written reflective note, is thus dedicated to the emphasis of this project’s academic and societal relevance through the display of a thorough literature review on the field of surveillance theory, as well as the methodological logic behind the project.
Albrechtslund, A. (2008). Online social networking as participatory surveillance. First Monday, 13(3). Retrieved from: https://firstmonday.org/article/view/2142/1949.
Allard-Huver, F., & Escurignan, J. (2018). Black Mirror’s “Nosedive” as a New Panopticon: Interveillance and Digital Parrhesia in Alternative Realities. In A. Cirucci, & B. Vacker (Eds.), Black Mirror and critical media theory (pp. 43-54). Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
Andrejevic, M. (2002). The work of watching one another: Lateral surveillance, risk, and governance. Surveillance & Society, 2(4), 479-497.
Andrejevic, M. (2007). iSpy: Surveillance and power in the interactive era. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.
Bentham, J., & Boz̆ovic̆, M. (Ed.). (1995). The panopticon writings. London, UK: Verso.
Bigo, D. (2006). Security, exception, ban and surveillance. In D. Lyon (Ed.), Theorising surveillance: The panopticon and beyond (pp. 46–68). Portland, OR: Willan Publishing.
Booth, W., Colomb, G., Williams, J., Bizup, J., & FitzGerald, W. (2016). The craft of research. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
boyd, d., & Ellison, N. B. (2007). Social network sites: definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 210–230.
Cirucci, A., & Vacker, B. (Eds.). (2018). Black mirror and critical media theory. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
C.R. (2013, September 23). When did globalisation start? The Economist. Retrieved from https://www.economist.com/free-exchange/2013/09/23/when-did-globalisation-start.
d’Aquinm M., & Troullinou, P. (2018). Seeing the “Surveillance Face” of Technology in Black Mirror: Using Futuristic Scenarios for an Interdisciplinary Discussion on the Feasibility and Implications of Technology. In A. Cirucci, & B. Vacker (Eds.), Black mirror and critical media theory (pp. 43- 54). Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
Dean, M. (2010). Governmentality: Power and rule in modern society. London, UK: SAGE.
Deleuze, G. (1992). Postscript on the societies of control. October, 59, 3-7.
Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1988). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. London, UK: Athlone Press.
Ericson, R., & Haggerty, K. (2000). The surveillant assemblage. British Journal of Sociology, 51(4), 605–22.
Foucault, M. (1991). Discipline and punish: the birth of the prison. London, UK: Penguin.
Galič, M., Koops, B., & Timan, T. (2017). Bentham, Deleuze and beyond: An overview of surveillance theories from the panopticon to participation. Philosophy & Technology, 30(1), 9-37.
Haggerty, K. (2006). Tear down the walls: on demolishing the panopticon. In D. Lyon (Ed.), Theorising surveillance: The panopticon and beyond (pp. 23–45). Portland, OR: Willan Publishing.
Jansson, A. (2015). Interveillance: A new culture of recognition and mediatization. Media and Communication, 3(3), 81-81.
Koehler, M., & Mishra, P. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A new framework for teacher knowledge. Teacher’s College Record, 8(9), 1017-1054.
Koehler, M., & Mishra, P. (2007). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK): Confronting the wicked problems of teaching with technology. In C. Crawford, D. A. Willis, R. Carlson, I. Gibson, K. McFerrin, J. Pricer, & R. Weber (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference 2007 (pp. 2214–2226). Chesapeake, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.
Koehler, M., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 60-70.
Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Lyon, D. (2007). Surveillance studies: an overview. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
Lyon, D. (2018). The culture of surveillance: Watching as a way of life. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
Lyon, D., & Trottier, D. (2012). Key Features of Social Media Surveillance. In C. Fuchs (Ed.), Internet and surveillance: The challenges of web 2.0 and social media (pp. 89-105). New York, NY: Routledge.
Mac Síthigh, D., & Siems, M. (2019). The Chinese social credit system: a model for other countries? (EUI Law Working Paper 2019/01). Retrieved from http://cadmus.eui.eu//handle/1814/60424.
McLellan, H. (2007). Digital storytelling in higher education. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 19(1), 65-79.
O’Neil, C. (2016). Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy. Largo, MD: Crown Books.
Robin, B. (2008). Digital storytelling: A powerful technology tool for the 21st century classroom. Theory into Practice, 47(3), 220-228.
Rosen, D., & Santesso, A. (2013). The watchman in pieces: Surveillance, literature, and liberal personhood. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Simon, B. (2002). The return of panopticism: Supervision, subjection and the new surveillance. Surveillance & Society, 3(1), 1-20.
Van Dijck, J. (2014). Datafiction, dataism and dataveillance: Big data between scientific paradigm and secular belief. Surveillance & Society, 12(2), 197-208.
Varian, H. (2014). Beyond big data. Business Economics, 49(1), 27-31.
Whitaker, R. (1999). The end of privacy: how total surveillance is becoming a reality. New York, NY: The New Press.
Zuboff, S. (2015). Big other: surveillance capitalism and the prospects of an information civilization. Journal of Information Technology, 30, 75–89.