How is Privacy perceived in German Police Law?

Rethinking Counterterrorist Policy in North-Rhine Westphalia

  • Jonas Bradtke
Keywords: surveillance, privacy, counterterrorism, security, Germany

Abstract

By December 2018, Germany’s biggest state, North-Rhine Westphalia (NRW) introduced its revised police law (PolG NRW). The PolG NRW enables previously forbidden surveillance practices to combat terrorism in Germany. Discussion surrounding the PolG NRW revolved around surveillance practices enabled through the law. By using a privacy taxonomy, developed by Daniel J. Solove (2010) this thesis has categorised, analysed and evaluated six sections of the PolG NRW with regards to infringements upon privacy. This thesis (1) identifies potentially harmful activities for personal privacy within the PolG NRW and (2) chases back shortcomings to an incomplete understanding of privacy. Thereby, this thesis suggests that future policy crafting must consider processes that follow the collection of information as potentially harmful activities. By limiting privacy risks to information gathering, activities that belong to information processing and distribution remain largely unregulated, putting the individual at serious risk.

References

Amnesty International. (2018). Neuer Entwurf zum Polizeigesetz in NRW: Gute Ansätze, noch mehr Versäumnisse. Retrieved June 8, 2019, from https://www.amnesty.de/informieren/aktuell/deutschland-neuer-entwurf-zum-polizeigesetz-nrw-gute-ansaetze-noch-mehr

Bronk, C (2008). Hacking the Nation State: Security, Information Technology and Policies of Assurance [Abstract]. Information Security Journal: A Global Perspective. Vol. 17, No. 3. doi: 10.1080/193935508021785565

de Bruin, B. (2010) The liberal value of privacy. Law and Philosophy, Vol. 29, No. 5, pp. 505–534.

Gavison, Ruth E. (2012). Privacy and the Limits of Law (May 16, 2012). The Yale Law Journal, Vol. 89, No. 3, pp. 421-471. Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=2060957

Germany, German Ministry for Political Education, BPD. (n.d.). Persöhnlichkeitsrecht. Berlin.

Germany, Polizeigesetz des Landes Nordrhein-Westfalen, Landtag NRW (2019).

Gusy, C., Dr. (2018). Stellungnahme zum Gesetzentwurf 6. Änderungsgesetz des PolG NRW. Universität Bielefeld, Bielefeld. Retrieved from: https://www.landtag.nrw.de/Dokumentenservice/portal/WWW/dokumentenarchiv/Dokument/MMST17-630.pdf

Götschenberg, M. (2019). Hacker veröffentlichen persönliche Daten von Politikern. Deutschlandfunk. Retrieved June 8, 2019, from https://www.deutschlandfunk.de/cyberangriff-auf-bundestag-hacker-veroeffentlichen.1773.de.html?dram:article_id=437443

Habermas, J. (1987). The theory of communicative action (Vol. 2.). Boston, MA: Beacon Press.

Himma, KE (2007) Privacy versus security: why privacy is not an absolute value or right. San Diego Law Review. Vol. 44, No. 4, pp. 859–919

Landynski, J.W. Privacy, Law, and Public Policy. David M. O'Brien: The Journal of Politics. Vol. 43, No. 2, pp. 594-596.

Lever, A (2013). A Democratic Conception of Privacy. Bloomington: AuthorHouse.

Lyon, D. (2014). Surveillance, Snowden, and Big Data: Capacities, consequences, critique. Big Data & Society. Vol. 1, No. 2. doi:10.1177/2053951714541861

Lyon, D. (2001). Surveillance after September 11, 2001. The Intensification of Surveillance, Vol. 6, No. 3, pp. 16-25. doi:10.2307/j.ctt18fs7k5.5

Marmor, A (2015) What is the right to privacy? Philosophy & Public Affairs. Vol. 43, No. 1, pp. 3-26.

Papathanassopoulos, S. (2015). Privacy 2.0. Social Media Society. Vol. 1, No.1. doi:10.1177/2056305115578141

Polizei Gewerkschaft Deutschland [Police Labour Union Germany]. (2018, May 30). Stellungnahme: Gesetz zur Stärkung der Sicherheit in Nordrhein-Westfalen[Press release]. Retrieved April 15, 2019.

Regan, P. M. (1995). Legislating privacy: Technology, social values, and public policy. Chapel Hill: The University of North, Carolina Press.

Schnell, L. (2018). Bayern hat das schärfste Polizeigesetz in Deutschland. Süddeutsche Zeitung. Retrieved June 8, 2019, from https://www.sueddeutsche.de/bayern/polizeiaufgabengesetz-inhalt-bayern-1.3973927

Sen, A. (1982). Rights and Agency. Philosophy & Public Affairs. Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 3-39. Retrieved April 15, 2019, from https://www.jstor.org/stable/2265041.

Solove, D. J. (2010). Understanding privacy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Taylor, I. (2017). Data collection, counterterrorism and the right to privacy. Politics, Philosophy & Economics. Vol. 16, No. 3, pp. 326-346. doi:10.1177/1470594x17715249

Teigeler, M. (2018, December 6). Polizeigesetz: Grüne drohen mit Verfassungsklage. WDR. Retrieved June 8, 2019, from https://www1.wdr.de/nachrichten/landespolitik/polizeigesetz-gruene-100.html

Thompson, J. J. (1975). The Right to Privacy. Philosophy & Public Affairs. Vol. 4, pp. 295-314. Retrieved April 15, 2019, from https://www.jstor.org/stable/2265075?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents.

Turnage, A.K. (2007) Surveillance and Security: Technological Politics and Power in Everyday Life by Monahan, T. The Communication Review. Vol. 10, No. 4, pp. 391-396. doi:10.1080/10714420701715514

Van Lieshout, M., Friedewald, M., Wright, D., & Gutwirth, S. (2012). Reconciling privacy and security. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research. Vol .26, No. 1-2, pp. 119-132 doi:10.1080/13511610.2013.723378

Walzer, M (2015) Just and Unjust Wars: A Moral Argument with Historical Illustrations (5th

edition). New York: Basic Books.

Warren, S. D., & Brandeis, L. D. (1890). The Right to Privacy. Harvard Law Review. Vol. 4, No. 5, p. 193. doi:10.2307/1321160

Zimmer, M. (2010). ‘‘But the data is already public’’: On the ethics of research in Facebook. Ethics in Technology. Vol. 12, pp. 313-325. doi:10.1007/s10676-010-9227-5

Figures:

Figure 1. A taxonomy of privacy. Adapted from ‘Understanding Privacy’, by Solove, 2010, Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.

Published
2019-10-08