Constructing environmental friendliness: The case of the German Blue Angel

Authors

  • Roya Savadkouhi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26481/marble.2012.v2.126

Abstract

Today’s product market is rich in different product labelling schemes, ranging from fairtrade to various eco-labels on national and international levels. A few decades ago this was not yet the case; only very few labels existed. The very first eco-label was the German Blue Angel which was founded in 1978. It is by now one of the most commonly known eco-labels certifying environmentally friendly products in Germany and abroad. It initially started with only a few product categories however, the Blue Angel is currently being used by around 980 producers, 21 per cent of which are foreign suppliers. The label is borne by over 11,000 products including for instance, furniture, varnish, paint, electrical devices and paper (Der Blaue Engel, 2011). In contrast to existing studies, I want to take a more distanced social scientific approach by analysing the Blue Angel’s main characteristic, namely its environmental friendliness. We attribute environmental friendliness as the focal value to products labelled with the Blue Angel. This label certifies environmental friendliness as a profound and distinct indication of quality for all Blue Angel certified specific products; in contrast to unlabelled products, which are recognised as being less environmentally friendly. As I will show in this paper, such qualities were far from self-evident or clearly defined. Furthermore, the boundaries of what constitutes environmental friendliness have been the object of constant readjustment and sometimes even open conflict within this labelling system. With the historical approach I have taken, the processes through which environmental friendliness has been shaped during the development of this labelling system and how certain standards of environmental friendliness evolved will be analysed. I will attempt to answer the question of why a need for labelling arose at all and how the idea of environmental friendliness and the Blue Angel have developed over time.

References

Blauer Engel auf Reifen kaum zu finden (2009). Focus Online. Retrieved 7 June, 2011 from http://www.focus.de/auto/news/blauer-engel-auf-reifen-kaum-zu-finden_aid_452823.html.

Bowker, G. C. & Star, S. L. (2000). Invisible Mediators of Action: Classification and the Ubiquity of Standards. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 7:1, 147-163.

Bowker, G. C. & Star, S. L. (2000)(a). Sorting things out. Classification and its consequences Cambridge: MIT Press.

Brockmann, K.L. & Hemmelskamp, J. (1995). Umweltzeichen und Verbraucherverhalten Wie “grün” ist der Blaue Engel? Discussion Paper No. 95-25. Zentrum für Europäische Wirtschaftsforschung GmbH (ZEW).

Brockmann, K.L & Hemmelskamp, J. (1997). Environmental Labels- The German ‘Blue Angel’. Futures, 29:1, 67-76.

Brüggemeier, F.-J. & Engels, J.I. (2005). Natur- und Umweltschutz nach 1945: Konzepte, Konflikte, Kompetenzen. Frankfurt/Main: Campus Verlag. Der Blaue Engel in Zahlen. (2011). Retrieved 24 May, 2011 from http://www.blauer-engel.de/de/blauer_engel/bilanz/index.php.

Dietrich, C. (2008). Produktionsmanagement in der Sozialen Marktwirtschaft. Umweltverträglichkeit von Produkten: Der Blaue Engel. München: GRIN Verlag.

Engels, J.I. (2006). Naturpolitik in der Bundesrepublik. Ideenwelt und politische Verhaltensstile in Naturschutz und Umweltbewegung 1950-1980. Paderborn: Schöningh Verlag.

Fujimura, J.H. (1996). Crafting Science. A Sociohistory of the Quest for the Genetics of Cancer. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Galarraga Gallastegui, I. (2002). The use of eco-labels: a review of the literature. European Environment, 12, 316- 331.

Grote, U. (2009). Environmental Labeling, Protected Geographical Indications and the Interests of Developing Countries. The Estey Centre Journal of International Law and Trade Policy, 10:1, 94-110).

Horne, R.E. (2009). Limits to labels: the role of eco-labels in the assessment of product sustainability and routes to sustainable consumption. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 33, 175-182.

Hünemörder, K.F. (2004). Die Frühgeschichte der globalen Umweltkrise und die Formierung der deutschen Umweltpolitik (1950-1973). Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner Verlag.

Jordan, A., R. Wurzel & A. Z. Zito (Eds.) (2003): ‘New’ Instruments of Environmental Governance? National Experiences and Prospects. London (Frank and Cass).

Jordan, A. Wurzel, R.K.W., Zito, A.R. & Brückner, L. (2009). Consumer Responsibility-Taking an Eco-Labeling Schemes in Europe. In Micheletti, M. Follesdal, A. & Stolle, D. (Eds.). Politics, Products and Markets: Exploring Political Consumerism Past and Present. New York, Brunswick: Transaction.

Klöpffer, W. & Grahl, B. (2009). Ökobilanz. Ein Leitfaden für Ausbildung und Beruf. Weinheim: WILEY- VCH Verlag.

Müller, E. (2005). Environmental labeling, Innovation and the Toolbox of Environmental Policy; Lessons Learned from the German Blue Angel Programme, in M.T. Hatch (ed.) Environmental Policymaking: Assessing the Use of Alternative Policy Instruments. New York: State University of New York Press.

Neveling, N. (2000). Produktinnovation durch Umweltzeichen. Eine vergleichende Untersuchung des deutschen und des europäischen Umweltzeichens. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft.

Proesler, M. (2008). Environmental Information for Products and Services. Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety, Federal Association of German Industry (BDI) and Federal Environment Agency.

Schirmer, W. (1980). Einführung Konkreter Kriterien für das Umweltzeichen. Analyse des Systems- Auffinden von Schwachstellen- Vorschläge für mögliche Verbesserungen. RAL. Deutsches Institut für Gütesicherung und Kennzeichnung e.V., Im Auftrage des Umweltbundesamtes.

Scholtz, H. (2004). Blue Angel, organisation, experiences and future perspectives. Seminar on Ecolabelling. December 14, 2004, Barcelona.

Siemann, W. (2003). Umweltgeschichte: Themen und Perspektiven. München: Verlag C.H. Beck.

Strauss, A. (1978). A Social World Perspective. Studies in Symbolic Interaction, 1, 119-28.

Strecker, A. (1972). Umweltgütezeichen eine Stärkung umweltfreundlichen Verhaltens? Verpackungs Rundschau. Nr. 4, Jahrgang 23.

Umweltzeichen für Haarsprays, Rasierseifenschäume, Deosprays, -stifte und Roller RAL-UZ 3, Laufzeit Januar 1978 bis 31.12.1999 (n.d.). Der Blaue Engel Presse-Information. Retrieved 24 May, 2011 from http://www.blauer-engel.de/_downloads/publikationen/erfolgsbilanz/ Erfolgsbilanz_Sprays.pdf.

WeyK.-G. (1982). Umweltpolitik in Deutschland: kurze Geschichte des Umweltschutzes in Deutschland seit 1900. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.

Weyer, S. (2008). Produktpolitik und Umweltkennzeichen- Theoretische Grundlagen und Praxiserfahrungen. München: GRIN Verlag.

Downloads

Published

2012-07-01