Life-cycle assessment in eco-labelling: Between standardisation and local appropriation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26481/marble.2012.v2.127Abstract
Over the last decades the demand for green and fair products by consumers has steadily increased and governments have undertaken greater efforts to devise green policies as well as to create incentives for industry to lessen the environmental impact of production processes (Finkbeiner, et al. 2006). Companies and large-scale multinational corporations, as well as national governments and local businesses are thus increasingly urged to account for the ecological footprint they leave behind and to actively improve their environmental performance. There exists a large variety of different scientific methods to analyse the environmental impact of a certain product, service or policy – for instance Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) or Risk Assessment. However, amongst the multiplicity of methods, life cycle assessment (LCA) has become one of the most prominent approaches, since it is considered to be the methodology that encompasses the widest range of possible environmental impacts. This chapter seeks to shed light on the tension between standardisation and local appropriation, in order to show that a certain degree of local responsiveness is necessary for the effectiveness of the method.
References
Bijker, W. (1987) The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Callon, M. (1987), Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation: Domestication of the Scallops and the Fishermen of St. Brieuc Bay. In The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology, eds. W.E. Bijker, T.P. Hughes, and T.J. Pinch, pp.83-103, Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.
Christiansen, K. (1991) Possibilities and Limitations to life cycle analysis. In Packaging and the Environment – Policies, Strategies and Instruments, University of Lund, Department of Industrial Environmental Economics, Lund.
Environmental Protection Agency, US [EPA] (1993) The Use of Life Cycle Assessment in Environmental Labelling Programmes. University of Tennessee, Knoxville Tennessee.
Finkbeiner, M., Inaba, A., Tan, R., Christiansen, K., Kluppel, H.J. (2006) The New International Standards for Life Cycle Assessment: ISO 14040 and ISO 14044. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 11 (2), pp. 80-85.
German Federal Ministry of the Environment, Nature Conservation, and Nuclear Safety [UBA] (1990), Documentation, International Conference on Environmental Labelling – State of Affairs and Future Perspective for Environment Related Product Labelling, July 5th-6th, Berlin, Germany.
Giezeman, H.G.M. and G. Verhees (1997), Stichting Milieukeur. Ecolabelling: Practical Use of Cradle to Grave, In Zarrilli, S., Jha, V., Vossenaar, R.(1997) Eco-labelling and International Trade. London: Palgrave, Macmillan.
Heiskanen, E. (1997) The Social Shaping of a Technique for Environmental Assessment, Journal of Science Studies, 11 (1), pp.27-51.
Hutchins, M.J. & Sutherland, J.W. (2006) The Role of the Social Dimension in Life Cycle Engineering, Michigan Technological University, Michigan.
Jensen, A., Hoffman, L., Moeller, B., Schmidt, A., et al. (1997), Life Cycle Assessment; A guide to approaches, experiences and information sources, European Environment Agency (EEA): Copenhagen.
Latour, B. (1987) Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
Law, J. (1999), After ANT: Complexity, Naming and Topology (pp.1-14), In Law, J. & Hassard, J. (1999), Actor Network Theory and After. Oxford, Blackwell Publishing Law, J.(1992), Notes on the Theory of the Actor-Network: Ordering, Strategy and Heterogeneity, Retrieved June 1st from, http://www.lancs.ac.uk/fass/sociology/papers/law-notes-on-ant.pdf
Melckmans, B. (2003) Strengths and weaknesses of Belgium’s social label. Research Services, Enterprise Dept., General Labour Federation of Belgium NA (2011), Sociaal Label: Het Lastenboek, Retrieved June 7th, 2011 from http://www.mi-is.be/be-nl/doc/socialeeconomie/ social-label-lastenboek.
Neitzel, H. (1992) Experiences with the Blue Angel Scheme (Environmental Labelling in Germany) Working Methods, Problems, Balance, and Perspectives. Annual Conference of the Environmental Law Network International, October 9th-10th , Athens, Greece.
Neitzel, H. (1997) LCA and Ecolabelling; Application of Lice Cycle Assessment in Environmental Labelling, International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2 (4), pp. 241-249 Scientific Applications International Corporation (SAIC), 2006, Life Cycle Assessment; Principles and Practice, National Risk Management Research Laboratory, Office of Research and Development, US EPA, Cincinatti, Ohio.
Sismondo, S. (2004) An introduction to Science and Technology Studies. Oxford: Blackwell.
Spillemaekers, S. (2007) The Belgian Social label: A governmental application of Social LCA, NA.
Timmermans, S., Berg, M. (1997) Standardisation in Action: Achieving Local Universality through Medical Protocols, Social Studies of Science, 27, 2, pp. 273-305.
Virtanen, Y. (1994) Life cycle assessment; goals, limitations and approved procedures. Presentation at seminar, Life Cycle Assessment in Product Development 4.-5.5., 1994, Neopolis, Lahti.
Williams, W. (2004) Eco-labelling. A Socio-economic Analysis. Doctoral thesis, WU Vienna University of Economics and Business.
Wurzel, W., Bruckner, L., Jordan, A., Zito, A.R., (2003) Consumer responsibility-taking and eco-labeling schemes in Europe. In Micheletti, M., Føllesdal, A., Stolle, D., (2003), Politics, Products and Markets: Exploring Political Consumerism. Transaction, Somerset: NJ.
