Regulating Innovation, Trade and Uncertain Risks - Full copy

  • Artur Albach
  • Prof. Dr. Ir. Marjolein BA van Asselt
  • Marisol Bock
  • Lukas Bühl
  • Laura Drott
  • Inka Eberhardt
  • Yann Finger
  • Johannes Gamroth
  • Rebekka Goeke
  • Jonas Hirschnitz
  • Marcel Hoß
  • Carolin Ifländer
  • Julian Jacobitz
  • Leïla Jebri
  • Lukas Jochum
  • Tobias Kalt
  • Felix Kartte
  • Sonja Koehler
  • Caspar Kolster
  • Franca König
  • Frieder Kühne
  • Frederik Lange
  • Nils Langensteiner
  • Daniel Limberg
  • Dorottya Liptai
  • Yanitsa Maksimova
  • Christian Malarciuc
  • Riikka Mikkonen
  • Simon Reetz
  • Juliane Reschke
  • Nicole Rode
  • Nele Rosenstock
  • Lena Scheffel
  • Matthias Schnippe
  • Isabel Skierka
  • Jasmine Styles
  • Joanna Switalska
  • Lea Tries
  • Lucas Unterberg
  • Jonas Vach
  • Anna Völlmecke
  • Christina von Hobe
  • Trebor Wagner

Abstract

MaRBLe Research Papers Maastricht Research-Based Learning Project (MaRBLe) Faculty of Law and Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences Maastricht University, 2015

References

Commission Decision 98/294/EC, 22 April 1998, OJ. OJ L 131/32 Commission Decision 2006/197/EC, 3 March 2006

Council of the European Union; Brussels, 17 February 2014, 2010/0208 (COD) Directive 90/220/EEC, 23 April 1990 OJ L 117

Directive 2001/18/EC, 12 March 2001 and repealing Council Directive 90/220/EEC, 17 April 2001 OJ L 106

Dispute Settlement Rules: Understanding on Rules and Procedures Governing the Settlement of Disputes, Marrakesh Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization, Annex 2; The results of the Uruguay Round of Multilateral Trade Negotiations 354,1999, 1869 U.N.T.S. 401, 33 I.L.M. 1226, 1994

Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2001/18/EC as regards the possibility for the Member States to restrict or prohibit the cultivation of GMOs in their territory”, European Commission (Brussels, 13.07.2010 COM)

Regulation 178/2002/EC, 28 January 2002, OJ L31/1 Regulation 1829/2003/EC, 22 September 2003, OJ L 268

Regulation 1830/2003/EC, 22 September 2003 and amending Directive 2001/18/EC [2003] OJ L 268/24

Case C-192/01 Commission v. Denmark [2003] E.C.R. 1-9693

Case E-3/00 EFTA Surveillance Authority v Norway [2000-2001] EFTA Ct. Rep. 73 Case T-13/99 Pfizer Animal Health v Council [2002] ECR II-3305

Case C-77/09 Gowan Comércio Internacional e Serviços Lda V Ministero della Salute [2010] ECR I-13533

Cases C-58/10 to C-68/10 Monsanto and Others [2011] ECR I-7763 Case C-41/02 Commission v Netherlands [2004] ECR I-11375

CE. 1 August 2013, Association génerale des producteurs de maïs (AGPM) et autres, Nos 358103,358615,359078

Case No. 2012-12 Philip Morris Asia Limited v. The Commonwealth of Australi, UNCITRAL, PCA Case

No. ARB/12/12 Vattenfall AB and others v. Federal Republic of Germany, ICSID

Case T-139/07, Pioneer Hi-Bred International v Commission [2009] not published in the ECR. Case T-164/10, Pioneer Hi-Bred International v Commission [2013] nyr.

Ethyl Corp. v EPA 24 ELR 21591 No. 93-1768, 25 F.3d 1241/(4th Cir., 06/01/1994) Industrial Union v American Petroleum Institute 448 US 607

Eli Lilly and Company v. The Government of Canada [2012], Notice of Intent to Submit a Claim to Arbitration under NAFTA

APHIS: The Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service Approval of Mycogen Seeds c/o Dow AgroSciences LLC and Pioneer Hi-Bred International. Seeking a Determination of Non-regulated Status For Bt Cry1F Insect Resistant, Glufosinate Tolerant Corn Line 1507:

Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact (June 2001). Retrieved from http://cera- gmc.org/docs/decdocs/02122001.pdf, last visited on 12 June 2014

APHIS Draft Combined Documents: Notices Federal Register Vol.61:52, Friday, March 15 1996. Retrieved from www.aphis.usda.gov/brs/aphisdocs/96_01701p.pdf last visited on June 12 2004

Communication from the Commission on the Precautionary Principle (Brussels, 02.02.2000 COM) Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the Economic and Social Committee, and the Committee of the Regions on the Freedom for Member States to Decide on the Cultivation of Genetically Modified Crops, European Commission (Brussels, 13.07. 2010 COM)

European Commission ‘MEMO: Questions and Answers on EU’s policies on cultivation and imports of GMOs’ (Brussels, 06.11.2013)

European Commission ‘Commission asks Council to agree on its proposal to grant Member States more subsidiarity on cultivation’ Press Release (Brussels, 06.11.2013)

European Commission ‘Draft Commission Decision of[...] concerning the placing on the market,in accordance with Directive 2001/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, of a maize product (Zea mays L., line 1507) genetically modified for resistance to certain lepidopteran pests.’ (Brussels, D003697/01)

European Commission ‘Proposal for a Council Decision concerning the placing on the market for cultivation, in accordance with Directive 2001/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, of a maize product (Zea mays L., line 1507) genetically modified for resistance to certain lepidopteran pests.’ 2013). (Brussels, 06.11.2013 COM)

EFSA(2013) Scientific Opinion on a request from the European Commission related to the emergency measure notified by Italy on genetically modified maize MON 810 according to Article 34 of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003. EFSA Journal 2013;11(9):3371

EFSA (2012) Scientific Opinion on a request from the European Commission related to the safeguard clause notified by Greece on genetically modified maize MON 810 according to Article 23 of Directive 2001/18/EC. EFSA Journal 2012;10(9):2877

EFSA (2012) Scientific Opinion on a request from the European Commission related to the emergency measure notified by France on genetically modified maize MON 810 according to Article 34 of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003. EFSA Journal 2012;10(5):2705

EFSA (2008) Scientific Opinion on a request from the European Commission related to the safeguard clause invoked by Austria on maize MON810 and T25 according to Article 23 of Directive 2001/18/EC. The EFSA Journal (2008) 891, p. 1-64

EFSA (2008) Scientific Opinion on a request from the European Commission related to the safeguard clause invoked by France on maize MON810 according to Article 23 of Directive 2001/18/EC and the emergency measure according to Article 34 of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003. The EFSA Journal (2008) 850, p. 1-45

EFSA (2008) Scientific opinion on a request from the European Commission related to the safeguard clause invoked by Greece on maize MON810 according to Article 23 of Directive 2001/18/EC. The EFSA Journal (2008) 757, p. 1-12.

EFSA (2008) Scientific opinion on a request from the European Commission related to the safeguard clause invoked by Hungary on maize MON810 according to Article 23 of Directive 2001/18/EC. The EFSA Journal (2008) 756, p. 1-18

EFSA (2006) Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms on a request from the Commission related to the safeguard clause invoked by Greece according to Ar ticle 23 of Directive 2001/18/EC and to Article 18 of Directive 2002/53/EC. The EFSA Journal (2006) 411, p. 1-26

EFSA (2008) Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms on a request from the European Commission related to the safeguard clause invoked by France on maize MON810 according to Article 23 of Directive 2001/18/EC and the emergency measure according to Article 34 of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003. The EFSA Journal (2008) 850

EFSA (2008) Scientific Opinion on a request from the European Commission related to the emergency measure notified by France on genetically modified maize MON 810 according to Article 34 of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003. EFSA Journal 2012; 10(5): 2705

EFSA Scientific Opinion: Request from the European Commission to review scientific studies related to the impact on the environment of the cultivation of maize Bt11 and 15071 Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (Question No EFSA-Q-2008-679); Adopted on 29 October 2008”, p. 1. The EFSA Journal 851, p. 1-27

EFSA(2013) Scientific Opinion on a request from the European Commission related to the emergency measure notified by Italy on genetically modified maize MON 810 according to Article 34 of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003. EFSA Journal 2013;11(9):3371

EFSA (2012) Scientific Opinion on a request from the European Commission related to the safeguard clause notified by Greece on genetically modified maize MON 810 according to Article 23 of Directive 2001/18/EC. EFSA Journal 2012;10(9):2877

EFSA (2012) Scientific Opinion on a request from the European Commission related to the emergency measure notified by France on genetically modified maize MON 810 according to Article 34 of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003. EFSA Journal 2012;10(5):2705

EFSA (2008) Scientific Opinion on a request from the European Commission related to the safeguard clause invoked by Austria on maize MON810 and T25 according to Article 23 of Directive 2001/18/EC. The EFSA Journal (2008) 891, p. 1-64

EFSA (2008) Scientific Opinion on a request from the European Commission related to the safeguard clause invoked by France on maize MON810 according to Article 23 of Directive 2001/18/EC and the emergency measure according to Article 34 of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003. The EFSA Journal (2008) 850, p. 1-45

EFSA (2008) Scientific opinion on a request from the European Commission related to the safeguard clause invoked by Greece on maize MON810 according to Article 23 of Directive 2001/18/EC. The EFSA Journal (2008) 757, p. 1-12.

EFSA (2008) Scientific opinion on a request from the European Commission related to the safeguard clause invoked by Hungary on maize MON810 according to Article 23 of Directive 2001/18/EC. The EFSA Journal (2008) 756, p. 1-18

EFSA (2006) Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms on a request from the Commission related to the safeguard clause invoked by Greece according to Ar ticle 23 of Directive 2001/18/EC and to Article 18 of Directive 2002/53/EC. The EFSA Journal (2006) 411, p. 1-26

EFSA (2008) Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms on a request from the European Commission related to the safeguard clause invoked by France on maize MON810 according to Article 23 of Directive 2001/18/EC and the emergency measure according to Article 34 of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003. The EFSA Journal (2008) 850

EFSA (2008) Scientific Opinion on a request from the European Commission related to the emergency measure notified by France on genetically modified maize MON 810 according to Article 34 of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003. EFSA Journal 2012; 10(5): 2705

EFSA Scientific Opinion: Request from the European Commission to review scientific studies related to the impact on the environment of the cultivation of maize Bt11 and 15071 Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (Question No EFSA-Q-2008-679); Adopted on 29 October 2008”, p. 1. The EFSA Journal 851, p. 1-27

EPA Biopesticide Fact Sheet- Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1Ab Delta-Endotoxin and the Genetic Material Necessary for Its Production in Corn [MON 810] (006430) Issued: 4/00, p.1. Retrieved from cera- gmc.org/docs/decdocs/01-290-037.pdf, last visited on 12 June 2014

EPA Memorandum 1996. Retrieved from http://www.epa.gov/opp00001/chem_search/cleared_reviews/csr_PC-006444_19-Dec-96_002.pdf, last visited on 12 June 2014

EPA/BPPD. Memorandum 1995 from Cough J to Mendelsohn M. Review of Product and mammalian Toxicology

EPA Pesticides: Regulating Pesticides. Bacillus thuringiensis Cry3Bb1 Protein Federal Register Notices 2005. Retrieved from http://www.epa.gov/oppbppd1/biopesticides/ingredients_keep/fr_notices/frnotices_006484.htm, last visited on 12 June 2014

EPA Regulation of Biotechnology for Use in Pest Management. Retrieved from http://www.epa.gov/oppbppd1/biopesticides/reg_of_biotech/eparegofbiotech.htm, last visited on 12 June 2014

GMO: Commission asks Council to agree on its proposal to grant Member States more subsidiarity on cultivation. Press Release, European Commission (Brussels, 06.11. 2013)

Monsanto Company (2007) Application for renewal of the authorization for continued marketing of existing MON 810 maize products that were authorized under Directive 90/220/EEC (Decision 98/294/EC) and subsequently notified in accordance to Article 20(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 on genetically modified food and feed. Retrieved from http://www.gmocompass.org/pdf/regulation/maize/MON810_summary_application_renewal_feed_cult.pdf, last visited on 12 June 2014

NRC. National Risk Council. Field Testing of Genetically Modified Organisms: Framework for Decision. Washington, D.C. National Academy Press 1989 Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms on an application (reference

EFSA- GMONL-2004-02) for the placing on the market of insect-tolerant genetically modified maize 1507, for food use according to Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 from Pioneer Hi-Bred International/Mycogen Seeds. The EFSA Journal 2005, 182 Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms on an application (reference EFSA- GMO-NL-2004-02) for the placing on the market of insect-tolerant genetically modified maize 1507, for food use, according to Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 from Pioneer Hi-Bred International/Mycogen Seeds. The EFSA Journal 2005,182

Petition for determination of non-regulated status: B.t. Cry1F insect-resistant, glufosinatetolerant maize line 1507 (10 May 2000). As retrieved from http://cera-gmc.org/docs/decdocs/04-225-004.pdf, last visited on 12 June 2014

Scientific Committee on Plants Opinion of the Scientific Committee on Plants Regarding the Genetically Modified, Insect Resistant Maize Lines Notified by the Monsanto Company; Submitted 10 February 1998. Retrieved from: http://ec.europa.eu/food/fs/sc/scp/out02_en.print.html, last visited 12 June 2014

The White House Case Study No II: Bt-MAIZE. Retrieved from www.whitehouse.gov/files/.../ceq_ostp_study3.pdf, last visited on 12 June 2014

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Biopesticide Registration Action Document: Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1F Corn (August 2001). As retrieved from http://cera- gmc.org/docs/decdocs/brad_006481.pd f, last visited on 12 June 2014

Robert Barlett; The Reserve Mining Controversy. Indianapolis, IN: InIndiana University Press, (1980) Luc Bodiguel & Michael Cardwell; The Regulation of Genetically Modified Organisms: Comparative Approaches. New York: Oxford University Press, (2010)

Gabriel Felbermayr, Benedikt Heid & Sybille Lehwald: Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP): Who benefits from a free trade deal? Bertelsmann Foundation: Global Economic Dynamics. June 17, (2013)

Miriam Haritz; An inconvenient Deliberation. The Precautionary Principle’s Contribution to the Uncertainties surrounding climate change liability. Netherlands: Wolters Kluwer Law & Business, (2011)

Joanne Linnerooth-Bayer et al., (Eds.); Transboundary risk managemen. London: Earthscan (2001) Julian Morris; Rethinking the risk and the precautionary principle. [1st edition], United Kingdom: Butterworth-Heinemann, (2000)

P. F. Ricci; Environmental and health risk assessment and management: Principles and practices. Dordrecht: Springer, (2006)

Jale Tosun; Risk Regulation in Europe: Assessing the application of the Precautionary Principle. New York [etc.]: Springer, (2013)

David Vogel; The Politics of Precaution: Regulating Health, Safety, and Environmental Risks in Europe and the United States. United States: Princeton University Press, (2012)

Jonathan B. Wiener; The reality of precaution: Comparing risk regulation in the United States and Europe. Routledge Press, (2011) 410 RITUR

Trade Conflict and the U.S.-European Union Economic Relationship [Report]; Raymond J. Ahearn, CRS Report for Congress, July 26, 2006

Report on the implementation of national measures on the coexistence of genetically modified crops with conventional and organic farming [Report]; Brussels: Final Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament COM/2006/0104

Measures affecting the approval and marketing of Biotech products[Report]; Reports of the Panel WT/DS291/R, WT/DS292/R, WT/DS293/R, European Communities, 2006

Assessment Report Notification Number C/ES/01/01 to Market Genetically Modificed Maize (Line 1507) Resistant to Lepidopterae and Tolerant to Glufosinate-Ammonium Herbicide Submitted by the Company Pioneer in accordance with Directive 2001/18/EC [Report]; Secretaria General de Medio Ambiente and Dirección General de Calidad y Evaluacion Ambiental. Retrieved from http://www.gmo- compass.org/eng/gmo/db/75.docu.html, last visited on 12 June 2014

Informing Regulatory Decisions: 2003 Report ti Congress on the Costs and Benefits of Federal Regulations and Unfunded Mandates on State, Local and Tribal Entities [Report]; Washington, DC: Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, 2003

Sandler, Travis & Rosenberg Trade Report 09-04-2013. TTIP Talks Inch Ahead Amid Disagreements on Tariffs, Investment, Other Issues. Retrieved from http://www.strtrade.com/news-publications- TTIP-US- European-Unio n-free-trade-a gree me nt-040914. html, last visited on 24 May 2014.

Alberto Alemanno; ‘The dialogue between judges and experts in the EU and WTO’ in: Filippo Fontanelli et al., (Eds.); Shaping rule of law through dialogue-international and supranational experiences. Groningen: Europa law publishing, (2010)

Alberto Alemanno; “The Shaping of the Precautionary Principle by European Courts: From Scientific Uncertainty to Legal Certainty”. Bocconi Legal Studies Research Paper No. 1007404, (2007)

James Applegate, “The Precautionary Preference-Environmental Protection in the Face of Scientific Uncertainty”. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment 6, (2000)

Fritz Breuss; ‘Economic Integration, EU-US Trade Conflicts and WTO Dispute Settlement’. European Integration online Papers 9 (12), (2005)

Lynton K. Caldwel ; ‘Beyond NEPA: Future Significance of the National Environmental Policy Act’. Harv. Envtl. L. Rev. 22, (1998)

Charnley, G. and E.D. El iott; ‘Risk versus Precaution: Environmental Law and Public Health Protection’. Environmental Law Reporter 32, (2002)

Theofanis Christoforou; “Genetically Modified Organisms in European Union Law”, in: Nicholas de Sadeleer (Ed.) Implementing the Precautionary Principle: Approaches From the Nordic Countries, London [Etc.]: Earthscan, (2007)

David A. Dana; “The Contextual Rationality of the Precautionary Principle”. Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. Faculty work ing papers, (2009)

William Freese & David Schubert; ‘Safety Testing and Regulation of Genetically Engineered Foods’. Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering Reviews 21(1), (2004)

Peter L.de Fur, Michel e Kaszuba; “Implementing the precautionary principle”. The Science of the Total Environment 288, (2002)

Stephen M. Gardiner; “A core precautionary principle”. The Journal of Political Philosophy 14 (1), (2006)

Caroline Henckels; ‘GMOs in the WTO: A critiques of the Panel’s legal reasoning in EC- Biotech’. Melbourne Journal of International Law 7, (2006)

Aaron Holdway; “Reducing Uncertainty: The Need to Clarify the Key Elements of the Precautionary Principle”. Consilience. The Journal of Sustainable Development, (2009)

Jasanoff Scheila; ‘A living Legacy: The Precautionary Ideal in American Law’. Environmental Science and Preventive Public Policy, (2003)

Drew L Kershen; ‘European decisions about the ‘Whack-a-Mole’ game’. M Crops & Food: Biotechnology in Agriculture and the Food Chain 5 (1), (2014)

Simon Lester and Inu Barbee, ‘The Chal enge of Cooperation: Regulatory Trade Barriers in the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership’. Journal of International Economic Law 16, (2013)

Emily Marden, ‘Risk and Regulation: U.S. Regulatory Policy on Genetically Modified Food and Agriculture’. 44 B.C.L. Rev. 733, (2003)

Shane H. Morris and Charles Spilane; ‘EU GM Crop Regulation: A Road to Resolution or a Regulatory Roundabout’. European Journal of Risk Research 4, (2010)

Archna Negi; ‘World Trade Organization and the EC Biotech Case Procedural and Substantive Issues’. International Studies 44(1), (2007)

Richard Parker & Alberto Alemanno; ‘Towards Effective Regulatory Cooperation Under TTIP: A Comparative Overview of the EU and US Legislative and Regulatory Systems’. European Commission, (2014)

Jacqueline Peel; “Precaution a matter of principle, approach or process?”. Melbourne Journal of International law 5, (2004) 412 RITUR

Denise Prevost; ‘Opening Pandora’s Box: The Panel’s Findings in the EC-Biotech Products Dispute’. Legal Issues of Economic Integration 34(1), (2007)

Joseph V. Rodricks et al.; ‘Significant risk decisions in federal regulatory agencies’. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology 7, (1987)

Noah M. Sachs; “Rescuing the Strong Precautionary Principle from its Critics”. University of Illinois Law Review 4, 2011 (2006)

Nicolas de Sadeleer; “The Precautionary Principle Applied to Food Safety –Lessons from EC Courts”. European Journal of Consumer Law 1, (2009)

D. Santil o et al.; “The Precautionary Principle in Practice: A mandate for Anticipatory Action”, in: C. Raffensperger& J. Tichner (eds.) Protecting Public Health and the Environment: Implementing the Precautionary, Washington D.C: Island Press, (1999)

Bernard Schwartz; ‘The Court and Cost-Benefit Analysis: An Administrative Law Idea Whose Time Has Come-or Gone?’. The Supreme Court Review, (1981)

Charles W. Schmidt; “Genetically modified foods: breeding uncertainty”. Environmental health perspectives, (2005)

Andrea L. Stephenson; ‘Germany’s ban of Monsanto’s Genetically Modified Maize (MON810): A Violation of International Law’. Trade, Law and Development 2(2), (2010)

James Tiedje et al.; ‘The Planned Introduction of Genetically Engineered Organisms: Ecological Considerations and Recommendations’. Ecology 70(2), (1986)

Marjolein B.A. van Asselt and Leendert van Bree; “Uncertainty, precaution and risk governance”. Journal of Risk Research 14 (4), (2011)

Marjolein B.A. van Asselt et al.; ‘Regulating Innovation, Trade and Uncertain Risk’ in: Marjolein B.A. van Asselt et al. (Eds.) Balancing between Trade and Risk. Integrating Legal and Social Science Perspectives. New York [etc.]: Earthscan Routledge, (2013)

Marjolein B.A. van Asselt & El en Vos; ‘Wrestling with uncertain risks: EU regulation of GMOs and the uncertainty paradox’. Journal of Risk Research 11 (1-2), (2008) p. 281-300

Marjolein B.. A. van Asselt , El en Vos; “The Precautionary Principle and the Uncertainty Paradox”. Journal of Risk Research 9(4), (2006)

Marjolein B.A. van Asselt & El en Vos; ‘The Precautionary Principle and the Uncertainty Paradox’. Journal of Risk Research 9 (4), (2006) p. 313-336

Fern Wickson and Brian Wynne; ‘Ethics of Science for Policy in the Environmental Governance of Biotechnology: MON810 Maize in Europe’. Ethics, Policy & Environment 15 (3), (2012) p. 321-340

Jonathan B. Wiener; “Whose precaution after all? A comment on the comparison and evolution of risk regulatory systems”. Duke Journal of Comparative & International Law 13(207), (2003)

Diahanna Lynch and David Vogel; ‘The Regulation of GMOs in Europe and the United States: A Case- Study of Contemporary European Regulatory Politics’. Council on Foreign Relations Press 05.04, (2001). Retrieved from http://www.cfr.org/agricultural-policy/regulation-gmoseurope- united-states- case-study-contemporary-european-regulatory-politics/p8688; last visited on 11 June 2014

Mark Pollack; ‘A Truce in the Transatlantic Food Fight: The United States, the European Union, and Genetically Modified Foods in the Obama Years’, (2013). Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/ abstract=2295197, last visited on 11 June 2014

M. Pollack; International Trade and Risk Regulation: Whatever Happened to the Transatlantic Gmo Conflict?; [Working Paper] APSA 2013, Annual Meeting Paper; American Political Science Association 2013 Annual Meeting, (2013), Retrieved from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers. cfm?abstract_id=2299609, last visited on 11 June 2014

Agnès E. Ricroch et al.; ‘Is the Suspension of MON810 Maize Cultivation by Some European Countries Scientifically Justified?’ ISB News Report April (2010). Retrieved from http://www. isb.vt.edu/news/2010/Apr/Suspension-of-MON810-Maize-Cultivation.pdf, last visited on 12 June 2014

Agnès E. Ricroch et al.; ‘What the French ban of Bt MON810 maize means for science-based risk assessment’ Nature Biotechnology 32 (6) 06.06, (2013). Retrieved from http://www.nature. com/nbt/journal/v31/n6/full/nbt.2613.html, last visited on 12 June 2014 Non-academic sources

A. Alemanno, ‘A reality check of TTIP: beyond the popular account’. Retrieved from http://www. euractiv.com/sections/trade-industry/reality-check-ttip-beyond-popular-account-301443, last visited 09 June 2014

Australian Government- Aottorney- General’s Department; ‘Tobacco plain packaging-investorstate arbitration’, (2011). Retrieved from http://www.ag.gov.au/internationalrelations/ internationallaw/pages/tobaccoplainpackaging.aspx, last visited 9 June 2014

Behn; ‘The TTIP, Investor-State Dispute Settlement, and the Future of International Investment Law in the EU and Norway’, (2014). Retrieved from http://blogg.uio.no/jus/smr/multirights/ content/the-ttip-investor-state-dispute-settlement-and-the-future-of-internationalinvestment- law-in, last visited 9 June 2014

BIO is the largest trade organization to serve and represent the biotechnology industry in the US and worldwide. Biotechnology Industry Organization (n.d.) Company Profile. Retrieved from http://www.biospace.com/company_profile.aspx?CompanyId=1311, last visited on 2 June 2014

Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership – Comments submitted by: Biotechnology Industry Organization (BIO) Docket Number: USTR-2013-0019, (2013), p.14. Retrieved from http://www.bio.org/sites/default/files/BIO%20TTIP%20submission%20May%202013%20 final%205%2 010%2013.pdf, last visited 2 June 2014

Suing the State: hidden rules within the EU-US trade deal, Sourced TV: Corporate Europe Observatory, (2014). Retrieved from http://corporateeurope.org/international-trade/2014/04/ new-video-suing-state- hidden-rules-within-eu-us-trade-deal, last visited 12 June 2014

Coordinated Framework for Regulation of Biotechnology. Office of Science and Technology Policy, Executive Office of the President, Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP), (1986); 51 FR 23302. Retrieved online from www.aphis.usda.gov/brs/fedregister/coordinated_framework. pdf, last visited on 19 May 2014

Barbara Crossette; ‘Globalization Tops 3-Day U.N. Agenda For World Leaders’, in: The New York Times, 03-09-2000. Retrieved via http://www.nytimes.com/2000/09/03/world/ globalization-tops-3-day- un-agenda-for-world- leaders.html?src=pm&pagewanted=1, last visited on 11 June 2014

Delvaux; ‘Pioneer’s application for GM maize 1507 to be authorised for cultivation’. European Parliament: Parliamentary Questions, Question for written answer to the Commission, Rule 117, 2013. Retrieved from http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc. do?type=WQ&reference=P-2013- 012662&language=EN, last visited 15 May 2014

M. Ermert, ‘TTIP: EU Commissioner Points Finger At US Secrecy, Investor-State Provisions’, (2014). Retrieved from http://www.ip-watch.org/2014/04/02/ttip-eu-commissioner-points-fingerat- us-secrecy- investor-state-provisions/, last visited 9 June 2014

The official webpage of the European Commission, DG Trade. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/ trade/policy/countries-and-regions/countries/united-states/, last visited 4 June 2014

EU-U.S. High Level Working Group on Jobs and Growth - Response to Consultation by EuropaBio and BIO s.d.

Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/policies/international/cooperating-governments/ usa/jobs- growth/files/consultation/regulation/15-europabio-bio_en.pdf, last visited on 11 June 2014

EU-US trade deal risks. No fracking way; ‘How the EU-US trade deal risks expanding fracking in Europe and the US’, News release, (2014). Retrieved from http://vimeo.com/88146142, last visited 27 May 2014

Euroactive (2014), Quoted in “Brussels wants to hear more on TTIP investor-state dispute clause”, Euroactive website, 2014. Retrieved from http://www.euractiv.com/trade/brussels-wantshear- ttip- investo-news-532919, last visited 27 May 2014

Food safety 10-12-2013. ‘Food safety in the EU-US trade agreement: going outside the box’ 10-12- 2013. Retrieved from http://www.grain.org/article/entries/4846-food-safety- in-the-eu-ustrade- agreement-going-outside-the-box, last visited on 11 June 2013

GE cultivation bans in Europe s.d.. GMO-Free-Regions (n.d.) GE cultivation bans in Europe. Retrieved from http://www.gmo-free-regions.org/gmo- free-regions/bans.html, last visited on 12 June 2014

GMO Compass 23-03-2007. GMO Compass; ‘Country Reports: GMOs in the EU Member States’, 2007. Retrieved from http://www.gmo-compass.org/eng/news/country_reports/, last visited 3 April 2014; “Country Reports”, retrieved from http://www.gmocompass.org/eng/ news/country_reports/267.field_trials_commercial_cultivation_spain.h tml, last visited on 3 April 2014

GMOs in Europe: A Status Report s.d.. Food and Water Watch: GMOs in Europe: A Status Report. Retrieved 28 May 2014 from: http://www.scribd.com/doc/6226556/GMOs- in-Europe-AStatus- Report, last visited on 12 June 2014

Hope 12-06-2013. C. Hope; ‘Major GM food company Monsanto ‘pulls out of Europe’. The Telegraph. Retrieved online on May 20, 2014, from http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/ environment/10186932/Major-GM-food-company-Monsanto-pulls- out-of-Europe.html, last visited 12 June 2014

ISAAA website: MON1445 s.d.. International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-Biotech Applications. Summary of Regulatory Approvals: Country, Year and Type of Approval. Retrieved from http:// www.isaaa.org/gmapprovaldatabase/event/default.asp? EventID=85, last visited on 12 June 2014

ISDS 2013. European Commission Fact Sheet on Investment Protection and Investor-to-State Dispute Settlement in EU agreements 2013. Retrieved from http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/ docs/2013/november/tradoc_151916.pdf, last visited 27 May 2014

List of Members BIO. Biotechnology Industry Organization (n.d.), List of Members. Retrieved from http://www3.bio.org/BioMembers/members_view_all.aspx, last visited on 2 June 2014

Online Archive of the Danish EU Presidency 2012: More than 20 Member States support the Presidency’s GMO compromise proposal 09-03-2012 Retrieved from: http://eu2012.dk/en/ NewsList/Marts/Uge-10/Auken, last visited on 12 June 2014

Leigh Philips; ‘EU’s Solution to a 12-Year GM Crop Ban: Let Individual States Decide What They Grow’, in: The Guardian, 13-06-2010. Retrieved from: http://www.theguardian.com/ environment/2010/jul/12/gm-crop-ban-eu-proposal, last visited on 12 June 2014

Philip BIT Arbitration. Morris International;’ Philip Bilateral Investment Treaty (BIT) Arbitration: Philip Morris Asia Limited & The Commonwealth of Australia’, 2014. Retrieved from http:// www.pmi.com/eng/media_center/company_statements/Pages/bilateral_investment_ treaty.aspx#, last visited 11 June 2014

Pioneer Hi-Bred & Mycogen Seeds, Document C/ES/01/01 Summary Notification Information For Products Containing Genetically Modified Higher Plants (GMHPs) In Accordance With Directive 2001/18/EC, 2001. Retrieved from http://www.gmo-compass.org/eng/gmo/db/75. docu.html , last visited 29 April 2014

V.Pop; ‘GMO maize vote highlights ‘absurd’ EU rules’ EU Observer, 2014. Retrieved from http:// euobserver.com/environment/123093, last visited on 12 June 2014

“Questions and answers” in focus: Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP). European Commission. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/trade/policy/in-focus/ttip/ questions-and-answers/, last visited on 27 May 2014

EU-U.S. High Level Working Group on Jobs and Growth Response to Consultation by EuropaBio and BIO. p.3-4. Retrieved from: http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/policies/international/ cooperating- governments/usa/jobs-growth/files/consultation/regulation/15-europabiobio_ en.pdf, last visited 3 June 2014, last visited on 27 May 2014

Site European Commission: Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP), Questions and answers. Retrieved from: http://ec.europa.eu/trade/policy/in- focus/ttip/questions-andanswers/, last visited on 11 June 2014

Site GMO compass: Maize 1507. Retrieved from: http://www.gmo-compass.org/eng/gmo/ popups/97.maize_1507.html, last visited on 11 June 2014

Strasser, ‘Es war einmal … die schönsten Märchen über TTIP’. Blog.campact!, 2014. Retrieved from: http://blog.campact.de/2014/05/es-war-einmal-de-guchts-schoenste-ttip- maerchen/, last visited 12 June 2014

European Commission Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) – Stakeholder event in Brussels. Retrieved from http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/press/index.cfm?id=1027, last visited 02 June 2014

Office of the United States Trade Representative - Stakeholder Engagement Events 2013. Retrieved from http://www.ustr.gov/about-us/press-office/blog/2013/December/TTIP-Third-Roundstakeholder- engagement, last visited 2 June 2014

Trans Atlantic Consumer Dialogue. Resolution on Investor-State Dispute Resolution in the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (DOC NO:TRADE 15/13). Retrieved from http://www.consumersinternational.org/media/1398522/tacd-ttip-resolution-on-investorstate- dispute- resolution.pdf, last visited 9 June 2014

G. Van Harten; ‘Interviewed in Suing the State: hidden rules within the EU-US trade deal. Sourced TV: Corporate Europe Observatory’, 2014. Retrieved from http://corporateeurope.org/ international- trade/2014/04/new-video-suing-state-hidden-rules-within-eu-us-trade-deal, last visited on 08 June 2014.

M. Webb; ‘Treaty Shopping: How Philip-Morris Cherry-Picked Worst Case BITs’. Retrieved from http://infojustice.org/archives/28044, last visited 9 June 2014

Published
2016-11-07