Repairing the Link? Civil Society’s Role Regarding Accountability Deficits of the German Government in EU Affairs

Authors

  • Jan Baars

Keywords:

civil society, accountability, Germany, European Union

Abstract

National governments acting in the Council of the European Union can rarely be held to account by parliaments and the public. This is because secrecy prevails in Council negotiations, and institutions of democratic scrutiny often lack information and resources to effectively control the executive. This study focuses on the involvement of Civil Society Organisations (CSOs) as a potential remedy to the lack of democratic control over governments’ positions in Council negotiations. Examining the German case, a qualitative analysis of 13 interviews with German CSO representatives shows that CSO involvement concentrates on direct dialogue with the German government: Although lacking formal sanctioning powers, CSOs engage in an informal, voluntary consultation with policy-makers, based on co-dependency. Thus, they enact a loose form of social accountability with the German government. In this role, CSOs are however constrained by several factors, such as access to policy-making arenas. The paper further shows that CSOs seldom trigger formal scrutiny mechanisms by alarming the Bundestag or the public on potential governmental wrongdoings. Therefore, they rarely make use of their second potential role as political accountability facilitators. As a result, this raises the question whether CSOs’ impact on the accountability deficit can make up for the lack of popular scrutiny in EU policy-making.

References

Albareda, A., & Braun, C. (2019). Organizing transmission belts: The effect of organizational design on interest group access to EU policy-making. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 57(3), 468-485.

Altides, C., & Kohler-Koch, B. (2009). Multi-level accountability via civil society associations. EUDO workshop, European University Institute, Florence.

Arras, S., & Beyers, J. (2020). Access to European Union Agencies: Usual Suspects or Balanced Interest Representation in Open and Closed Consultations? JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 58(4), 836-855. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12991

Auel, K. (2007). Democratic accountability and national parliaments: Redefining the impact of parliamentary scrutiny in EU affairs. European Law Journal, 13(4), 487-504.

Baumgartner, F. R., & Jones, B. D. (1993). Agendas and Instability in American Politics. University of Chicago Press.

Beetham, D., & Lord, C. (2001). Legitimising the EU: Is there a Post-parliamentary Basis for its Legitimation? Journal of Common Market Studies, 39(3), 443-462.

Berkhout, J., & Hanegraaf, M. (2014). Mapping EU-level Interest Group Population. https://www.intereuro.eu/data.html

Berry, J. M. (2002). Validity and Reliability Issues In Elite Interviewing. Political Science and Politics, 35(4), 679-682.

Beyers, J., Braun, C., Marshall, D., & de Bruycker, I. (2014). Let’s talk! On the practice and method of interviewing policy experts. Interest Groups and Advocacy, 3(2).

Boeije, H. (2009). Analysis in Qualitative Research. Sage Publications.

Bouwen, P. (2002). Corporate lobbying in the European Union: The Logic of Access. Journal of European Public Policy, 9(3), 365-390. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760210138796

Bovens, M. (2007). Analysing and Assessing Accountability: A Conceptual Framework. European Law Journal, 13(4), 447-468.

Bovens, M., Schillemans, T., & Goodin, R. E. (2014). Public Accountability. In M. Bovens, T. Schillemans, & R. E. Goodin (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Public Accountability (Vol. 1, pp. 1-22). Oxford University Press.

Christiansen, T., & Piattoni, S. (2003). Informal Governance in the European union. Edward Elgar.

Crum, B. (2017). National Parliaments and Constitutional Transformation in the EU. European Constitutional Law Review, 13(4), 817-835. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1574019617000281

Curtin, D. (2014). Overseeing Secrets in the EU: A Democratic Perspective. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 52(3), 684-700. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12123

De Bruycker, I., & Beyers, J. (2019). Lobbying strategies and success: Inside and outside lobbying in European Union legislative politics. European Political Science Review, 11(1), 57-74. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773918000218

Della Porta, D., & Diani, M. (1999). Social Movements: An Introduction. Blackwell Publishing.

Dexter, L. A. (2006). Elite and Specialized Interviewing. ECPR.

Eising, R. (2017). Studying Interest Groups: Methodological Challenges and Tools. European Political Science, 16(3), 291-305. https://doi.org/10.1057/eps.2016.14

Eriksen, E. O. (2000). Deliberative Supranationalism in the EU. In E. O. Eriksen, J. E. Fossum (Eds). Democracy in the European Union: Integration through deliberation, 42-64. Routledge.

Finke, B. (2007). Civil Society Participation in EU Governance. CONNEX.

Follesdal, A., & Hix, S. (2006). Why there is a democratic deficit in the EU: A response to Majone and Moravcsik. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 44(3), 533-562.

Gais, T., & Walker, J. J. (1991). Pathways to Influence in American Politics. In J. J. Walker (Ed.), Mobilizing interest groups in America (pp. 104-111). The University of Michigan Press.

Gattermann, K., Högenauer, A.-L., & Huff, A. (2013). National Parliaments after Lisbon: Towards Mainstreaming of EU Affairs? OPAL Online Paper Series, 2013(13).

Grande, E. (2000). Post-National Democracy in Europe. In M. T. Greven & L. W. Pauly (Eds.), Democracy Beyond the State? The European Dilemma and the Emerging Global Order (pp. 115-138). Rowman & Littlefield.

Greenwood, J. (2007). Organized Civil Society and Democratic Legitimacy in the European Union. British journal of Political Science, 37(2), 333-357.

Groen, A., & Christiansen, T. (2015). National Parliaments in European Union: Conceptual Choices in the European Union's Constitutional Debate. In C. Hefftler, C. Neuhold, O. Rozenberg, & J. Smith (Eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of National Parliaments and the European Union. Palgrave Macmillan.

Gustavsson, S., Karlsson, C., & Persson, T. (2009). Taking accountability seriously. In S. Gustavsson, C. Karlsson, & T. Persson (Eds.), The Illusion of Accountability in the European Union (pp. 170-175). Routledge.

Hefftler, C., & Rozenberg, O. (2015). Introduction. In C. Hefftler, C. Neuhold, O. Rozenberg, & J. Smith (Eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of National Parliaments and the European Union. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-28913-1

Héritier, A. (1999). Elements of Democratic Legitimation in Europe: An Alternative Perspective. Journal of European Public Policy, 6(2), 269-282.

Hobolt, S. B., Tilley, J. R., & Oxford University, P. (2014). Blaming Europe? Responsibility without Accountability in the European Union. Oxford University Press.

Höing, O. (2015). With a Little Help of the Constitutional Court: The Bundestag on its Way to an Active Policy Shaper. In C. Hefftler, C. Neuhold, O. Rozenberg, & J. Smith (Eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of National Parliaments and the European Union (pp. 191-208). Palgrave Macmillan.

Klüver, H. (2013). Lobbying in the European Union: Interest groups, Lobbying Coalitions, and Policy Change. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199657445.001.0001

Kohler-Koch, B. (2008). Civil Society in EU Governance – A Remedy to the Democratic Accountability Deficit? Concepts & Methods, 4(1), 3-6.

Kohler-Koch, B. (2010). How to Put Matters Right? Assessing the Role of Civil Society in EU Accountability. West European Politics, 33(5), 1117-1141. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2010.486141

Kohler-Koch, B., & Quittkat, C. (2013). De-mystification of Participatory Democracy : EU Governance and Civil Society (1. ed. ed.). Oxford University Press.

Kollman, K. (1998). Outside Lobbying: Public Opinion and Interest Group Strategies. Princeton University Press.

Kreilinger, V. (2019). National Parliaments in Europe’s Post-crisis Economic Governance. Hertie School.

Kröger, S. (2019). How limited representativeness weakens throughput legitimacy in the EU: The example of interest groups. Public Administration, 97(4), 770-783. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12410

Leino, P. (2017). Secrecy, Efficiency, Transparency in EU Negotiations: Conflicting Paradigms? Politics and Governance, 5(3), 6-15.

Linneberg, M. S., & Korsgaard, S. (2019). Coding qualitative data: a synthesis guiding the novice. Qualitative Research Journal, 19(3), 259-270. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRJ-12-2018-0012

Maloney, W. (2009). Interest Groups and the Revitalisation of Democracy: Are we Expecting too much? . Representation, 45(3), 277-287.

McCubbins, M. D., & Schwartz, T. (1984). Congressional Oversight Overlooked: Police Patrols versus Fire Alarms. American Journal of Political Science, 28(1), 165-179.

Meijer, A. (2014). Transparency. In M. Bovens, R. E. Goodin, & T. Schillemans (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Public Accountability. Oxford University Press.

Norris, P. (2014). Watchdog Journalism. In M. Bovens, R. E. Goodin, & T. Schillemans (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Public Accountability. Oxford University Press.

Papadopoulos, Y. (2007). Problems of Democratic Accountability in Network and Multilevel Governance. European Law Journal, 13(4), 469-486. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2007.00379.x

Papadopoulos, Y. (2010, 2010/09/01). Accountability and Multi-level Governance: More Accountability, Less Democracy? West European Politics, 33(5), 1030-1049. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2010.486126

Parks, L. (2009). Improving accountability in the European Union–the potential role of NGOs. In S. Gustavsson, C. Karlsson, & T. Persson (Eds.), The Illusion of Accountability in the European Union (pp. 155-169). Routledge.

Persson, T. (2009). Civil society participation and accountability. In S. Gustavsson, C. Karlsson, & T. Persson (Eds.), The Illusion of Accountability in the European Union (pp. 170-189). Routledge.

Princen, S. (2011). Agenda Setting. In E. Versluis, M. Van Keulen, & P. Stephenson (Eds.), Analyzing the European Union Policy Process (pp. 107-131). Palgrave Macmillan.

Princen, S., & Kerremans, B. (2008). Opportunity Structures in the EU Multi-Level System. West European Politics, 31(6), 1129-1146. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402380802370484

Raunio, T. (2009). National parliaments and European integration: What we know and agenda for future research. The Journal of Legislative Studies, 15(4), 317-334.

Saldaña, J. (2013). The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers (Second edition. ed.). SAGE Publications.

Saurugger, S. (2008). Interest Groups and Democracy in the European Union. West European Politics, 31(6), 1274-1291.

Schattschneider, E. E. (1960). The Semisovereign People: A Realist's View of Democracy in America. Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

Schmidt, V., & Wood, M. (2019). Conceptualizing Throughput Legitimacy: Procedural Mechanisms of Accountability, Transparency, Inclusiveness and Openness in EU Governance. Public Administration, 97(4), 727-740. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12615

Schmidt, V. A. (2013). Democracy and Legitimacy in the European Union revisited: Input, output and ‘throughput’. Political Studies, 61(1), 2-22.

Schmitter, P. C. (2000). How to Democratize the European Union--and why Bother? Rowman & Littlefield.

Schoenefeld, J. J. (2021). Interest Groups, NGOs or Civil Society Organisations? The Framing of Non-State Actors in the EU. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 32(3), 585-596. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-020-00283-w

Schreurs, M. A. (2012). The Politics of Phase-out. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 68(6), 30-41.

Smismans, S. (2002). Institutional Balance as Interest Representation. Some reflections on Lenaerts and Verhoeven. In C. Joerges & R. Dehousse (Eds.), Good Governance in Europe’s Integrated Markets (pp. 89-108). Oxford University Press.

Smith, M. A. (2000). American Business and Political Power: Public Opinion, Elections, and Democracy. University of Chicago Press.

Sprungk, C. (2013). A new type of Representative Democracy? Reconsidering the role of National Parliaments in the European Union. Journal of European Integration, 35(5), 547-563.

Steffek, J., & Ferretti, M. P. (2009, 2009/01/01). Accountability or “Good Decisions”? The Competing Goals of Civil Society Participation in International Governance. Global Society, 23(1), 37-57. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600820802556736

Strøm, K. (2000). Delegation and Accountability in Parliamentary Democracies. European Journal of Political Research, 37(3), 261-290.

Wessels, B. (1999). European Parliament and Interest Groups. In R. Katz & B. Wessels (Eds.), The European Parliament, the National Parliaments, and European Integration (pp. 105-128). Oxford University Press.

Winzen, T. (2012). National Parliamentary Control of European Union Affairs: A Cross-national and Longitudinal Comparison. West European Politics, 35(3), 657-672. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2012.665745

Wonka, A., & Haunss, S. (2020). Cooperation in Networks: Political Parties and Interest Groups in EU Policy-Making in Germany. European Union Politics, 21(1), 130-151. https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116519873431

Downloads

Published

2022-01-07