And yet, it moves: Lobbying Regulation in the Council of Ministers of the European Union
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26481/marble.2022.v1.879Keywords:
Transparency, Council of Ministers, Lobbying, Inter-Institutional AgreementAbstract
This study aims to explain the commitment of the Council of the European Union to the Inter-Institutional Agreement on a common Transparency Register for interest representatives with the Commission and European Parliament in 2021. To scrutinize this surprising turn in the hitherto transparency-averse position of the Council, this study draws on a set of elite interviews with Council sources and transparency stakeholders. The emerging data are analyzed through a theoretical framework grounded in institutionalist theory, grouped in a strategic, institutional, and ideational dimension. Evidence on a strategic dimension suggests a transparency-averse majority in the Council that explains the overall skepticism of the institution towards advancing lobbying transparency. The institutional dimension reveals the Council as compelled by norm-entrepreneurship and a logic of appropriateness instilled by other institutional actors in the Inter-Institutional Agreement. Lastly, the ideational dimension reveals shifting notions of transparency, as well as effective change agency and knowledge sharing through pro-transparency actors within the Council. The study concludes that, while a merely strategic analysis of institutional change fails to explain reform, a holistic institutionalist perspective, considering different dimensions of institutional change, is well suited to explain the advance of lobbying transparency in the Council. Further research could draw on the tentative findings of this research and attempt a longitudinal assessment of drivers and inhibitors of lobbying transparency in the Council.
References
Aberbach, J. D., & Rockman, B. A. (2002). Conducting and coding elite interviews. Political Science and Politics, 35(4), 673–676.
Anastasiadis, S., Moon, J., & Humphreys, M. (2018). Lobbying and the responsible firm: Agenda‐setting for a freshly conceptualized field. Business Ethics: A European Review, 27(3), 207-221. https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12180
Bailer, S. (2010). What factors determine bargaining power and success in EU negotiations? Journal of European Public Policy, 17(5), 743-757. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501761003748765
Bakir, C., & Jarvis, D. S. (2017). Contextualising the context in policy entrepreneurship and institutional change. Policy and Society, 36(4), 465-478. https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2017.1393589
Bakir, C., & Jarvis, D. S. (Eds.). (2018). Institutional entrepreneurship and policy change. Palgrave Macmillan.
Battilana, J., Leca, B., & Boxenbaum, E. (2009). How Actors Change Institutions: Towards a Theory of Institutional Entrepreneurship. Academy of Management annals, 3(1), 65-107. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520903053598
Billet, S. (2007). The theologies of transparency in Europe: the limits and possibilities of ‘fusion’in the EU transparency regime. Journal of Public Affairs: An International Journal, 7(4), 319-330. https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.271
Bjurulf, B., & Elgström, O. (2004). Negotiating transparency: The role of institutions. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 42(2), 249-269. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2004.00487.x
Borońska-Hryniewiecka, K. (2015). The Black Box of European Legislation: The Motivation (or Lack of It) behind Transparency in EU Policymaking. no. 106. https://www.ceeol.com/search/gray-literature-detail?id=511736
Bouza Garcia, L. (2015). Participatory democracy and civil society in the EU: Agenda-setting and institutionalisation. Palgrave Macmillan.
Bunea, A. (2018). Legitimacy through targeted transparency? Regulatory effectiveness and sustainability of lobbying regulation in the European Union. European Journal of Political Research, 57(2), 378-403. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12231
Chari, R. S., Murphy, G., & Hogan, J. (2007). Regulating lobbyists : A comparative analysis of the United States, Canada, Germany and the European Union. Political Quarterly, 2007, V. 78, N. 3, July-september, P. 422-438. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-923X.2007.00870.x
Cini, M. (2008). European commission reform and the origins of the European Transparency Initiative. Journal of European Public Policy, 15(5), 743–760. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760802133245
Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Basics of Qualitative Research (3rd ed.). SAGE.
Council Legal Service. (2017). Legal Analysis 5151/17. Commission Proposal for an Inter-Institutional Agreement on a Mandatory Transparency Register - Legal analysis. https://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-5151-2017-INIT/en/pdf
Council of the European Union. (2021, April 21). Legislative Act 5655/21 on the Interinstitutional Agreement between the European Parliament, the Council of the European Union and the European Commission on a mandatory transparency register. Author.
Council Presidency. (2017). Proposal for an Inter-Institutional Agreement on a mandatory Transparency Register - Approval of a negotiating mandate. 15332/17. Author. https://www.consilium.europa.eu/media/31958/st15332en17.pdf
Crepaz, M. (2017). Why do we have lobbying rules? Investigating the introduction of lobbying laws in EU and OECD member states. Interest Groups & Advocacy, 6(3), 231-252. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41309-017-0025-x
Crepaz, M., & Chari, R. (2014). The EU’s initiatives to regulate lobbyists: good or bad administration? Cuadernos Europeos De Deusto, 51, 71–97. https://doi.org/10.18543/ced-51-2014pp71-97
Dinan, W. (2021). Lobbying transparency: The limits of EU monitory democracy. Politics and Governance, 9(1), 237-247. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v9i1.3936
Dolowitz, D.P., & D. Marsh. (2000). Learning from abroad: The role of policy transfer in contemporary policy-making. Governance 13(1), 5–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/0952-1895.00121
Dür, A., & Mateo, G. (2012). Who lobbies the European Union? National interest groups in a multilevel polity. Journal of European public policy, 19(7), 969-987. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2012.672103
European Commission. (2016). Proposal for a Interinstitutional Agreement on a mandatory Transparency Register. COM(2016) 627. Author. https://ec.europa.eu/transparency/documents-register/detail?ref=COM(2016)627&lang=en
Finke, D. (2017). Underneath the culture of consensus: Transparency, credible commitments and voting in the Council of Ministers. European Union Politics, 18(3), 339–361. https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116517709972
Goldstein, K. (2002). Getting in the Door: Sampling and Completing Elite Interviews. PS: Political Science & Politics, 35(4), 669-672. doi:10.1017/S1049096502001130
Goodman, L. A. (1961). Snowball sampling. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 32(1), 148–170.
Greenwood, J., & Dreger, J. (2013). The Transparency Register: A European vanguard of strong lobby regulation?. Interest Groups & Advocacy, 2(2), 139-162. https://doi.org/10.1057/iga.2013.3
Greenwood, J., & Roederer-Rynning, C. (2021). Organized interests and trilogues in a post-regulatory era of EU policy-making. Journal of European Public Policy, 28(1), 112–131. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2020.1859592
Grigorescu, A. (2007). Transparency of Intergovernmental Organizations: The Roles of Member States, International Bureaucracies and Nongovernmental Organizations. International Studies Quarterly, 51(3), 625–648. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2478.2007.00467.x
Grønbech-Jensen, C. (1998). The Scandinavian tradition of open government and the European Union: problems of compatibility?. Journal of European Public Policy, 5(1), 185-199. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501768880000091
Hanegraaff, M., & Berkhout, J. (2019). More business as usual? Explaining business bias across issues and institutions in the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy, 26(6), 843–862. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2018.1492006
Hillebrandt, M. Z., Curtin, D., & Meijer, A. (2014). Transparency in the EU Council of Ministers: An Institutional Analysis. European Law Journal, 20(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1111/eulj.12051
Hogan, J. W., Murphy, G., & Chari, R. S. (2008). “Next Door They Have Regulation, But Not Here…”: Assessing the Opinions of Actors in the Opaque World of Unregulated Lobbying. Canadian Political Science Review, 2(3), 125-151.
Holman, C., & Luneburg, W. (2012). Lobbying and transparency: A comparative analysis of regulatory reform. Interest Groups & Advocacy, 1(1), 75-104.
Howard Grøn, C., & Wivel, A. (2011). Maximizing influence in the European Union after the Lisbon Treaty: From Small State Policy to Smart State Strategy. Journal of European Integration, 33(5), 523–539. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2010.546846
Karr, K. (2007). Democracy and lobbying in the European Union. Campus Verlag.
Keeling, S., Feeney, S., & Hogan, J. (2017). Transparency! Transparency? Comparing the new lobbying legislation in Ireland and the UK. Interest Groups & Advocacy, 6(2), 121-14. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41309-017-0015-z
Kretschmer, H., & Schmedes, H. J. (2010). Enhancing Transparency in EU Lobbying? How the European Commission's Lack of Courage and Determination Impedes Substantial Progress. Internationale Politik und Gesellschaft, 1, 112-122.
Lindlof, T. R. (2008). Idiographic vs nomothetic science. The International Encyclopedia of Communication. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405186407.wbieci005
March, J.G. & Olsen, J.P. (1995). Democratic Governance. The Free Press.
Meijer, A. (2013). Understanding the complex dynamics of transparency. Public Administration Review, 73(3), 429–439. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12032
Meijers Commitee. (2020). CM2004 Note on steps to take towards the improvement of the transparency of Council decision making during the upcoming EU Presidency of the Federal Republic of Germany. Author. https://www.commissie-meijers.com/sites/all/files/cm2004_note_en_final.pdf
Milicevic, A. (2017). The Mandatory Transparency Register Initiative-Towards a Better Governance of Lobbying in the EU. Rev. Eur. L., 19, 71-113.
Monaghan, E. (2008). Civil society, democratic legitimacy and the European Union : democratic linkage and the debate on the future of the EU (dissertation). Univ. of Nottingham.
Moravcsik, A. (1993). Preferences and Power in the European Community: A Liberal Intergovernmentalist Approach. Journal of Common Market Studies, 31(4), pp. 473–524. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.1993.tb00477.x
Mosley, L. (2013). Interview research in political science. Cornell University Press. https://doi.org/10.7591/9780801467974
Naurin, D. (2007). Deliberation behind closed doors: Transparency and lobbying in the European Union. ECPR press.
Richards, D. (1996). Elite interviewing: approaches and pitfalls. Politics, 16(3), 199–204. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9256.1996.tb00039.x
Rickert, H. (1915). Kulturwissenschaft und Naturwissenschaft. JCB Mohr.
Roederer-Rynning, C., & Greenwood, J. (2021). Black boxes and open secrets: trilogues as ‘politicised diplomacy.’ West European Politics, 44(3), 485–509. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2020.1716526
Rubin, H., & Rubin, I. (2012). Qualitative Interviewing : The art of hearing data (3rd ed.). SAGE.
Smismans, S. (2014). Regulating interest group participation in the EU: Changing paradigms between transparency and representation. European Law Review, 39, 470-492.
Tansey, O. (2007). Process tracing and elite interviewing: A case for non-probability sampling. PS: Political Science and Politics, 40(4), 765-772.
Windelband, W. (1904). Geschichte und Naturwissenschaft. Heitz und Mündel. (Original work published 1894)
Wisker, G. (2009) The Undergraduate Research Handbook. Palgrave Macmillan.
