A Prerequisite for Accountability: Access to Information in the German European Affairs Council

Authors

  • David Baumgärtner-Griffiths

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26481/marble.2022.v1.882

Keywords:

Information, parliamentary oversight, European affairs

Abstract

Negotiations in the Council of the European Union have been described as non-transparent since access to certain documents concerning the deliberations is restricted. As a result, national parliaments struggle to hold their national governments to account. Parliaments, providing a direct link between voters and the executive, play a vital role in granting legitimacy to the EU. Their incapacity weakens the democratic legitimacy of the European project. Existing literature on the topic has examined the formal powers of national parliaments and how active they are. However, it has failed to explore their access to information. This paper analyses the access to information on deliberations in the Council by the German European Affairs Committee (EAC) in the Bundestag. Interviews were conducted with members of the German EAC and their EU policy advisors. The analysis revealed that the German EAC employs an extensive network of direct oversight, manually scrutinizing a large number of documents. Certain limitations of this method were revealed, as due to capacity constraints only select decisions were examined. Individual citizens, organized interest and the media were shown to play a role in triggering the oversight at times, thus providing the impetus to start the scrutiny process.

References

Albrecht, F., Karlsson, C., Persson T. (2021). Patterns of Parliamentary Opposition: Empirical Evidence from the Deliberations in the German Bundestag’s Committee on European Union Affairs, Parliamentary Affairs, 74 (1), 230–251. https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsz048

Auel, K. (2006). The Europeanisation of the German Bundestag: Institutional change and informal adaptation. German Politics, 15 (3), 249-268. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644000600877701

Auel, K. (2019). National Parliaments and the European Union. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.1490

Auel, K. & Benz, A. (2005). Politics of Adaptation: The Europeanization of National Parliamentary Democracy. Journal of Legislative Studies, 11(3–4), 372–393. https://doi.org/10.1080/13572330500273570

Auel, K. & Christiansen, T. (2015) After Lisbon: National Parliaments in the European Union. West European Politics, 38 (2), 261-281. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2014.990693

Auel, K. & Neuhold, C. (2017). Multi-arena players in the making? Conceptualizing the role of national parliaments since the Lisbon Treaty. Journal of European Public Policy, 24 (10), 1547-1561. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2016.1228694

Auel, K., Rozenberg, O. & Tacea, A. (2015a). Fighting Back? And, If So, How? Measuring Parliamentary Strength and Activity in EU Affairs. In C. Hefftler, C. Neuhold, O. Rozenberg & J. Smith (Eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of National Parliaments and the European Union (pp. 60-93). Palgrave Macmillan.

Auel, K., Rozenberg, O. & Tacea, A. (2015b). To Scrutinise or Not to Scrutinise? Explaining Variation in EU-Related Activities in National Parliaments. West European Politics, 38 (2), 282-304. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2014.990695

Beichelt, T. (2012). Recovering Space Lost? The German Bundestag's New Potential in European Politics. German Politics, 21 (2), 143-160. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644008.2012.677030

Bennet, A. and Elman, C. (2008). Case Study Methods. In C. Reus-Smit & D. Snidal (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Relations. (pp. 499-517). Oxford University Press.

Berry, J. M. (2002). Validity and Reliability Issues in Elite Interviewing. PS: Political Science and Politics, 35(4), 679-682. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096502001166

Blom-Hansen, J. (2005). Principals, agents, and the implementation of EU cohesion policy. Journal of European Public Policy, 12 (4), 624-648. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760500160136

Boeije, H. (2009). Analysis in Qualitative Research. SAGE Publishing.

Bovens, M., Schillemans, T., and ‘t Hart, P. (2008). Does Public Accountability Work? An Assessment Tool. Public Administration, 86 (1), 225–242. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2008.00716.x

Bovens, M., Goodin, R. E. & Schillemans, T. (2014). Public Accountability. In M. Bovens, R.E. Goodin & T. Schillemans (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Public Accountability (1-22). Oxford University Press.

Damonte, A., Dunlop, C.A. & Radaelli, C.M. (2014). Controlling bureaucracies with fire alarms: policy instruments and cross-country patterns. Journal of European Public Policy, 21 (9), 1330-1349. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2014.923021

Decision of the German Federal Constitutional Court of October 12, 1993 In Re Maastricht Treaty. (Cases 2 BvR 2134/92, 2 BvR 2159/92). https://iow.eui.eu/wp-content/uploads/sites/18/2013/04/06-Von-Bogdandy-German-Federal-Constitutional-Court.pdf

Etzioni, A. (2010). Is Transparency the Best Disinfectant? The Journal of Political Philosophy, 18 (4), 389–404. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9760.2010.00366.x

Groen A. & Christiansen T. (2015). National Parliaments in the European Union: Conceptual Choices in the European Union’s Constitutional Debate. In C. Hefftler, C. Neuhold, O. Rozenberg & J. Smith (Eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of National Parliaments and the European Union (pp. 43-59). Palgrave Macmillan.

Hancké, B. (2009). Intelligent Research Design. Oxford University Press.

Hennink, M., Hutter I., & Bailey, A. (2011). Qualitative research methods. SAGE Publishing.

Hobolt S. & Tilley, J. (2014A, March 11). While voters might blame the EU for policy failures, it is extremely difficult for them to effectively hold it to account. London School of Economics and Political Science. https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/europpblog/2014/03/11/while-voters-might-blame-the-eu-for-policy-failures-it-is-extremely-difficult-for-them-to-effectively-hold-it-to-account/

Hobolt S. & Tilley J. (2014B). Blaming Europe? Responsibility Without Accountability in the European Union. Oxford University Press.

Holzhacker, R. L. (2002). National Parliamentary Scrutiny over EU Issues: The Goals and Methods of Governing and Opposition Parties. European Union politics, 3 (4), 459-579. https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116502003004004

Jarvis, M.D. (2014). Hierarchy. In M. Bovens, R.E. Goodin & T. Schillemans (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Public Accountability (1-18). Oxford University Press.

Jensen, C.B. (2007). Implementing Europe: A Question of Oversight. European Union Politics, 8(4), 451–477. https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116507082810

Jensen, C.B. (2011). Procedural Change and the Sources of Ex Ante Constraints in EU Legislation. Governance, 24 (3), 495-516. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2011.01534.x

Karlsson, C. & Persson, T. (2020). Comparing oppositional behaviour in European Union affairs: empirical evidence from six member states, West European Politics. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2020.1814618

Karlas, J. (2012). National Parliamentary Control of EU Affairs: Institutional Design after Enlargement. West European Politics, 35 (5), 1095-1113. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2012.706412

Leech, B. L. (2002). Interview Methods in Political Science. PS: Political Science and Politics, 35(4), 663-664. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096502001117

Leech, B. L., Baumgartner, F., La Pira, T., & Semanko, N. (2005). Drawing Lobbyists to Washington: Government Activity and the Demand for Advocacy. Political Research Quarterly, 58(1), 19-30. https://doi.org/10.2307/3595592

Linneberg, M.S. & Korsgaard, S. (2019). Coding qualitative data: a synthesis guiding the novice. Qualitative Research Journal, 19 (3), 259-270. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRJ-12-2018-0012

McCubbins, M. D. & Schwartz, T. (1984). Congressional Oversight Overlooked: Police Patrols versus Fire Alarms. American Journal of Political Science, 28 (1), 165-179. https://doi.org/10.2307/2110792

Meijer, A. (2014). Transparency. In M. Bovens, R.E. Goodin & T. Schillemans (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Public Accountability (1-20). Oxford University Press.

Moravcsik, A. (1994). Why the European Union Strengthens the State: Domestic Politics and International Cooperation (CES Working Paper No. 52). Harvard University, Centre for European Studies. http://aei.pitt.edu/9151/

Neuhold, C. & Smith, J. (2015). Conclusion: From ‘Latecomers’ to ‘Policy Shapers’? – The Role of National Parliaments in the ‘Post-Lisbon’ Union. In C. Hefftler, C. Neuhold, O. Rozenberg & J. Smith (Eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of National Parliaments and the European Union (pp. 668-686). Palgrave Macmillan.

O'Reilly, E. (2017). Decision in strategic inquiry OI/2/2017/TE on the transparency of the Council legislative process. https://www.ombudsman.europa.eu/en/decision/en/94896

Papadopoulos, Y. (2007). Problems of Democratic Accountability in Network and Multilevel Governance. European Law Journal, 13 (4), 469-486. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2007.00379.x

Pollack, M. (1997). Delegation, Agency, and Agenda Setting in the European Community. International Organization, 51(1), 99-134. https://doi.org/10.1162/002081897550311

Rozenberg, O. & Hefftler, C. (2015). Introduction. In C. Hefftler, C. Neuhold, O. Rozenberg & J. Smith (Eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of National Parliaments and the European Union (pp. 1-42). Palgrave Macmillan.

Rubin, H. J., & Rubin, I. S. (2012). Qualitative Interviewing: The Art of Hearing Data (3 ed.). SAGE Publishing.

Saalfeld, T. (2005). Deliberate delegation or abdication? Government backbenchers, ministers and European Union legislation. The Journal of Legislative Studies, 11 (3-4), 343-371. https://doi.org/10.1080/13572330500273547

Schmidt, V. (2013). Democracy and Legitimacy in the European Union Revisited: Input, Output and ‘Throughput’. Political Studies, 61 (1), 2-22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2012.00962.x

Sprungk, C. (2010). Ever more or ever better scrutiny? Analysing the conditions of effective national parliamentary involvement in EU affairs. European Integration Online Papers, 14 (2), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1695/2010002

Stübgen, M. (2013, March 22). “Tagesordnungspunkt 34.“ Germany. Parliament. Bundestag. Plenarprotokoll 17/232. 17th Parliament, 232nd session. http://dip21.bundestag.de/dip21/btp/17/17232.pdf

Tallberg, J. (2002). Paths to Compliance: Enforcement, Management, and the European Union. International Organization, 56(3), 609-643. https://doi.org/10.1162/002081802760199908

Treaty of Lisbon amending the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty establishing the European Community (2007, December 13). Official Journal of the European Union, C306/1-271.

Winzen, T. (2013). European integration and national parliamentary oversight institutions. European Union Politics, 14 (2), 297–323. https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116512467088

Whisker, G. (2009). The Undergraduae Research Handbook. Palgrave Macmillan.

Downloads

Published

2022-01-07